![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what's the process to change the up weight on a Kitfox 7 to the Sport
weight of 1320#.Thanks LJ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:43:59 -0700, LJ & Nancy Blodgett
wrote: what's the process to change the up weight on a Kitfox 7 to the Sport weight of 1320#.Thanks LJ Enter a gross weight of 1320# on the form when you register it. ================================================== == Del Rawlins-- Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately you cannot lower a Gross weight to meet Sport Plane Standards
once an aircraft has been certified at a higher gross weight. Has your plane already been certified (not the same as registered). Lyman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank Del. The plane is all ready registered at 1550#,I want to lower
it to 1320# for a sport plane.It is one of the 15 planes we built as a group. Thanks for any help. LJ Del Rawlins wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:43:59 -0700, LJ & Nancy Blodgett wrote: what's the process to change the up weight on a Kitfox 7 to the Sport weight of 1320#.Thanks LJ Enter a gross weight of 1320# on the form when you register it. ================================================== == Del Rawlins-- Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Hatz Lyman C" wrote in message
... Unfortunately you cannot lower a Gross weight to meet Sport Plane Standards once an aircraft has been certified at a higher gross weight. Has your plane already been certified (not the same as registered). Lyman May I ask for your reference? Specifically for a reference that pertains to an aircraft in the Experimental - Amateur Built category, not a production, Type-Certificated design. Rich S. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It has been fying and has about 80 hour now.It is registered.certified,I
don't understand.What would that intail(sp)? LJ Hatz Lyman C wrote: Unfortunately you cannot lower a Gross weight to meet Sport Plane Standards once an aircraft has been certified at a higher gross weight. Has your plane already been certified (not the same as registered). Lyman |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is my take that might work.
Ask that the listed gross weight is reduced. Why? because during the testing phase, the plane didn't perform as expected. You felt unsafe at your tested gross weight. For safety, please lower the gross weight to 1329. Isn't the testing phase designed for checking out the plane's parameters so it can be safely flown? If it isn't, why have a testing phase at all. My Bellanca has a red line of 216 MPH. Why such a weird number? It is 90% of the demonstrated test speed of 240 MPH. (240-24). For safety the CAA dropped off 10%. You should be able to do the same from your testing program. -- Cy Galley EAA Safety Programs Editor Always looking for ideas and articles for EAA Sport Pilot "LJ & Nancy Blodgett" wrote in message ... Todd,I don't know that it has been certified? It has been registered and the 40 hours flowen off.If at all possible I would like to change the weight,as the plane dose meet the Light Sport Plane in every way. Todd Pattist wrote: "Rich S." wrote: Unfortunately you cannot lower a Gross weight to meet Sport Plane Standards once an aircraft has been certified at a higher gross weight. May I ask for your reference? Specifically for a reference that pertains to an aircraft in the Experimental - Amateur Built category, not a production, Type-Certificated design. He's referring to the "since its original certification" language below: §1.1 General definitions. * * * * * Light-sport aircraft means an aircraft, other than a helicopter or powered-lift that, since its original certification, has continued to meet the following: (1) A maximum takeoff weight of not more than-- ... (ii) 1,320 pounds (600 kilograms) ... Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Todd,I don't know that it has been certified? It has been registered and
the 40 hours flowen off.If at all possible I would like to change the weight,as the plane dose meet the Light Sport Plane in every way. Todd Pattist wrote: "Rich S." wrote: Unfortunately you cannot lower a Gross weight to meet Sport Plane Standards once an aircraft has been certified at a higher gross weight. May I ask for your reference? Specifically for a reference that pertains to an aircraft in the Experimental - Amateur Built category, not a production, Type-Certificated design. He's referring to the "since its original certification" language below: §1.1 General definitions. * * * * * Light-sport aircraft means an aircraft, other than a helicopter or powered-lift that, since its original certification, has continued to meet the following: (1) A maximum takeoff weight of not more than–– ... (ii) 1,320 pounds (600 kilograms) ... Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cy Galley" wrote in message
news:aJk4d.91311$D%.90322@attbi_s51... Here is my take that might work. Ask that the listed gross weight is reduced. Why? because during the testing phase, the plane didn't perform as expected. You felt unsafe at your tested gross weight. For safety, please lower the gross weight to 1329. Isn't the testing phase designed for checking out the plane's parameters so it can be safely flown? If it isn't, why have a testing phase at all. My Bellanca has a red line of 216 MPH. Why such a weird number? It is 90% of the demonstrated test speed of 240 MPH. (240-24). For safety the CAA dropped off 10%. You should be able to do the same from your testing program. Cy........... I feel somewhat the same about the "specified" gross weight of an Experimental - Amateur Built aircraft. I'm not even sure the gross weight is recorded with the FAA. I'm sure that the other parameters are not, such as stall spped, max speed (Vh), propeller type, cabin pressurization - even retractable gear. Then too, there is the proviso that one may make changes - even major changes - to an airplane of this class. I will agree that the new regs do say in order to be certified as a LSA, the aircraft must have, since it's original certification, continued to meet the limitations. But in this case, we are not alking about changing the certification of the aircraft. We are simply trying to meet the intent of this statement: "Aircraft with a standard airworthiness certificate that meet above specifications may be flown by sport pilots. However, that airworthiness certification category will not be changed to a light-sport aircraft. Holders of a sport pilot certificate may fly an aircraft with a standard airworthiness certificate if it meets the definition of a light-sport aircraft." It is a small point perhaps and one that may be better left unquestioned. It is my feeling that the particular wording was adopted at the behest of the existing and hopeful LSA aircraft manufacturers in order to sell more new airplanes. I have no basis for this opinion except an assumption of avarice. Letting the people who stand to make a buck set the rules of the game doesn't seem kosher. I suppose there is always the option of abandoning the certification of an airplane and then going through the process again with a lower gross on the data plate. Oh, BTW I would ask for 1319# - not 1329" ![]() Rich S. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"LJ & Nancy Blodgett" wrote in message
... Who do I ask? I do think your on the right track.Sence I have the repair permit and I can change any thing as lone as it's loged,wy not the gross weight?The one's at the airport say,why not,but so far,no real answer.SO who DO I ask. LJ Unless the language of the rules is changed, there may currently be a conflict between the Sport Pilot regulations and the regs affecting Experimental/Amateur built. I don't know. It may be better to NOT ask. Rich "Just my take on it" S. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Weight and Balance | Dale Larsen | Home Built | 2 | June 23rd 04 05:11 PM |
Weight of a Harley Evo / Twin-cam 88 for aircraft? | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 3 | June 4th 04 01:56 PM |
Pitts S-1 weight and balance | wallyairplanefan | Aerobatics | 2 | March 6th 04 04:09 AM |
Weight of snow on wings | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 10 | January 4th 04 10:58 PM |
Weight of Lycoming O290 | Ray Toews | Home Built | 1 | December 21st 03 11:56 PM |