![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Borgelt" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:41:42 -0400, "C.Fleming" wrote: Not just like on Earth. The lower gravity means the density doesn't drop off as quickly with altitude as on Earth. Air density decreases with altitude. Both here and on Mars. The already thin air on Mars at the surface is even thinner aloft. That's my point. The glider wouldn't be ripped apart by flying at high TAS(q is still low) unless there was a flutter problem which could be induced by the shockwaves you are going to get by flying at some large fraction of the local speed of sound or supersonically unless your aircraft design takes care of this, which can be done. That's what I said. Flying supersonically would rip the glider apart. The folks at NASA are doing studies on Mars airplanes. It isn't that easy but obviously someone thinks it is doable. That's why I clearly said 'conventional glider.' 1% density means the TAS/IAS ratio is 10. Mike Borgelt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soaring Society of America National Convention, Feb 10-12 Ontario,CA | Jim Skydell | Home Built | 1 | January 31st 05 04:33 AM |
Martin Mars wreckage found | John Szalay | Naval Aviation | 12 | December 16th 04 11:40 PM |
Advanced Soaring Seminar - Eastern PA | B Lacovara | Home Built | 0 | February 9th 04 01:55 AM |
Advanced Soaring Seminar - Eastern PA | B Lacovara | Piloting | 0 | February 9th 04 01:54 AM |