![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John B" wrote in message om... Hello all, I'm looking for an airplane to purchase or build, but I can't find one that meets all of my needs/wants (yes, I know, all airplanes are a bucket of compromises). So, I'm asking all of you out there for advice on any airplanes that would fit this profile. Important to Haves: - could be kept outdoors (eliminates fabric?) - can carry 2 people - could be eligible for sport pilot flight (1232lbs gross) - could cruise at 95+ kts - could do limited/basic aerobatics - has at least reasonable short/soft field performance (say 1500-2000' grass) - is relatively cheap to fly (engine 115hp or so, decent TBO, 5-6gph cruise) - it's not a one-off design that has no parts support or can't be insured - if I have to build it, it needs to be "easy" (I've never built something, a quoted time of ~400hrs maybe?) Nice to Haves: - side-by-side seating - tricycle gear (mostly for insurance) - could be used to teach my Dad to fly (in terms of flying/landing qualities..I'm thinking sport-pilot-esqe, so I don't know about the regulations/legalities yet) - I'm partial to high-wing, just because of the view down, rather than the view up. - Is a type-certificated airplane (I am seriously considering a homebuilt, but would prefer something that I could be flying sooner rather than later) - could have gyros/ifr certified? This is very low priority, but if it could not be grounded by "benign" ifr, that would be a bonus From my research, I can't find an airplane that meets all these ideals. Something like a Citabria might be close, but the fabric wings/wood spar rule it out (hangars are 5x more expensive than tiedown at my airport, and you can't get one anyway even if you wanted). Something like a Zenith Experimental is close, but I don't think you can do aerobatics in a 601, and the 701 is much more STOL (and slower cruise) than I want. Also, the sport-pilot criteria are greatly limiting, so that would probably be the first to go, although I do have a few friends that are interested in the sport pilot license and might be potential partners if it can fit. I'm a 24 year old professional engineer, with about 190hrs total time, with a private SEL w/ instrument rating. I don't have tons of money by any means, but I think right now I could afford maybe $20,000-$30,000 worth of airplane, as long as the operating costs are reasonably low (in airplane terms ;-) I just want something that I can fly around on nice days, take friends along sometimes, could learn to do limited aerobatics (yes, I would definitely take lots of lessons), and could take on trips of up to 80nm to visit family around the area. Thanks everybody, and I welcome any suggestions of airplanes as well as suggestions of ways to change my criteria above from those who've been through my experience before. John Bumgarner For a low wing suggestion with exceptional "above" visibility you could a lot worse than consider the Slingsby T67C. http://www.slingsby.co.uk/firefly.htm#clients I don't know whether there are any on the US market but they are a well build plane, composite, hard wearing and my Dad used to be the Chief Inspector issuing certificates of airworthiness. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave wrote: For a low wing suggestion with exceptional "above" visibility you could a lot worse than consider the Slingsby T67C. It weighs 1300 pounds too much to meet the requirements. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: For a low wing suggestion with exceptional "above" visibility you could a lot worse than consider the Slingsby T67C. It weighs 1300 pounds too much to meet the requirements. Compromise |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |