A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

'Nother PW-5/World Class question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 28th 03, 06:17 AM
tango4
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But part of the whole purpose of the WCG was to provide a reasonably priced
entry level ship!

I'm not saying that thats the way it should have been. I think that a ship
like the Discus perhaps should have emerged as the world class. The cost
aspect should have been given lower priority in the selection process.
People then would have wanted to compete in a class that leveled the playing
field performance wise but still was an optimum performer at the time. In
sailing the olympic class boats are far from veing the cheapies!

Perhaps the IGC could come up with a brief that allowed the entry into the
selection process on the basis that the manufacturer would share design info
after a period of time allowing all other manufacturers to produce an
identical ship after the initial period.

This would have got ships like the Discus and LS8's into the process. Who
knows by the time the process starts again maybe one of the manufacturers
will give up their exclusive rights and allow this to happen with an
existing ship?

With several manufacturers producing ships to varying levels of finish
state, Kit, part assembled, complete, there would be natural price
competition as well as some preference for a particular manufacturers
product.

Ian



"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message
...
tango4 wrote:

How about all the current LS-4 or 101D owners who would just love to see
their ships value dive because a brand new one could be bought for

fraction
of their current value?


Would the new manufacturer be so foolish as to sell new gliders for less
than the price of an old one, when he could easily get a higher price?
It would be more profitable to sell them for more than the price of a
used one, and set the price for enough sales for a suitable production
rate.

The used prices might drop a bit, but the owners of the used gliders
would be pleased to know that parts are available.

--
-----
Replace "SPAM" with "charter" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Class III vs. Class II medical G. Sylvester Piloting 11 February 8th 05 06:41 PM
Carrying flight gear on the airlines Peter MacPherson Piloting 20 November 25th 04 12:29 AM
Question Medical Captain Wubba Piloting 5 June 11th 04 05:12 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.