A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

iPaq screen reflections - anyone really happy with their solution?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 03, 05:06 PM
Libelle Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What are you doing, flying with your left hand?

"Tony Verhulst" wrote in message
...
Mike Borgelt wrote:

Next question - while footling with the PDA how is your lookout?


Much better than when trying to decipher a sectional chart. And, once
set, GN II really doesn't require much "footling".

Next question - do you have it mounted where it blocks the forward and
down view from the cockpit?


See http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING/cockpit_3.jpg

Tony V. LS6-b "6N"



  #2  
Old December 3rd 03, 06:22 PM
Tony Verhulst
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Libelle Driver wrote:
What are you doing, flying with your left hand?


Yeah. Not much choice because of the location of the shutter button.
Also on the LS6, the gear handle is on the right so have to fly with the
left hand on the stick for a short period of time. Not really a problem.

Tony V.
http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING

  #3  
Old December 3rd 03, 10:31 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tony Verhulst wrote:

Libelle Driver wrote:

What are you doing, flying with your left hand?



Yeah. Not much choice because of the location of the shutter button.
Also on the LS6, the gear handle is on the right so have to fly with the
left hand on the stick for a short period of time. Not really a problem.


An awfully nice day to be flying with a zero Macready setting...
--
-----
Replace "SPAM" with "charter" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

  #4  
Old December 4th 03, 03:44 PM
Tony Verhulst
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


An awfully nice day to be flying with a zero Macready setting...


You actually use that?

Tony

  #5  
Old December 4th 03, 08:52 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Tony Verhulst wrote:

An awfully nice day to be flying with a zero Macready setting...



You actually use that?


Absolutely. The glider computer (I use Glide Navigator also) is usually
set to 4 to give me a safety margin to potential landout sites. The 302
is usually set to at least one, and on a good looking day in the
picture, at least 2 or 3, to encourage me to fly somewhere in the
proximity of the correct speed. I don't follow it slavishly.

--
-----
Replace "SPAM" with "charter" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

  #6  
Old December 3rd 03, 10:06 PM
Jim Kelly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

| See http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING/cockpit_3.jpg
| Tony V. LS6-b "6N"

Tony, that iPaq mount seems to handle the wiring nicely. Which
brand/model is it??

Cheers,

Jim Kelly

  #7  
Old December 4th 03, 12:08 AM
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

The cradle in the photo is a Mertins mount. I sell them for Enrique
Mertins.
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com/mertins.htm

Even better is the TEKK cradle:
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com/tekk.htm

Paul Remde
Cumulus Soaring Supplies

"Jim Kelly" wrote in message
u...
| See http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING/cockpit_3.jpg
| Tony V. LS6-b "6N"

Tony, that iPaq mount seems to handle the wiring nicely. Which
brand/model is it??

Cheers,

Jim Kelly



  #8  
Old December 4th 03, 04:10 PM
Tony Verhulst
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The cradle in the photo is a Mertins mount. I sell them for Enrique
Mertins.
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com/mertins.htm


Even better is the TEKK cradle:
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com/tekk.htm


Seriously? I think the Mertins mount is pretty good and have a hard time
imagining a significant improvement. Can you be specific?

Tony V

  #9  
Old December 5th 03, 10:57 PM
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

I think the Mertins mount is a good product. Enrique does a very nice job
making them in molds, etc. But some customers that purchased them in the
past said they were not impressed with them because they look a little "home
made". I think the web site mentions that they are home made, but... I've
had to take one unit back for a refund. The unit worked fine but didn't
meet the customer's expectations for the price.

The TEKK cradle is mass produced and it looks it. It also has a latching
mechanism that is much easier to use (and just as secure) as the Mertins
solution.

The only possible downside to the TEKK cradle is that the cable doesn't run
through the gooseneck. There is actually a way to do that with a minor
modification, but it requires removing and re-attaching the connector. I've
never had any customer complain about the TEKK cradle. I actually get
e-mails from customers saying how much they love it and it's worth the
price. They sometimes include photos of the installation.

Please don't get the impression that I don't like the Mertins mount.
Enrique is very nice to work with and his cradles are nice if you want a
cradle that will hold an iPAQ in an expansion pack.

Good Soaring,

Paul Remde
Cumulus Soaring Supplies

"Tony Verhulst" wrote in message
...

The cradle in the photo is a Mertins mount. I sell them for Enrique
Mertins.
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com/mertins.htm


Even better is the TEKK cradle:
http://www.cumulus-soaring.com/tekk.htm


Seriously? I think the Mertins mount is pretty good and have a hard time
imagining a significant improvement. Can you be specific?

Tony V



  #10  
Old December 9th 03, 05:05 PM
Guy Byars
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think the Mertins mount is a good product. Enrique does a very nice job
making them in molds, etc. But some customers that purchased them in the
past said they were not impressed with them because they look a little

"home
made". I think the web site mentions that they are home made, but... I've
had to take one unit back for a refund. The unit worked fine but didn't
meet the customer's expectations for the price.


I returned that unit to Paul earlier this year. It didn't meet my
expectations because it didn't work. The IPAQ wouldn't connect to the CAI
302 using that mount. I assume the mount connector was not making adequate
contact in the IPAQ or there was some other wiring problem.

Also the fit was so poor the IPAQ consistantly became stuck in the mount.
To extract the IPAQ I would have to hold the mount in one hand, the IPAQ in
the other and pull with clenched teeth until my face turned red... then the
IPAQ would come out. Waxing the edges of the IPAQ helped, but goodness
gracious, what a pain.

To Paul's credit, he did take the Mertin's mount back and give the credit
toward a TEKK mount which worked and fit perfectly from the start.

Guy Byars


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calling all aviation enthusiasts – this is your chance to see two classic RAF movies on the big screen (Hull - Yorkshire). Phillip Rhodes Military Aviation 0 September 7th 04 01:30 PM
Ipaq - GPS_Log Help needed (Long) Steve B Soaring 1 September 27th 03 06:00 AM
iPAQ h2210/h2215 Review Paul Remde Soaring 0 September 3rd 03 03:45 AM
Real World Specs for FS 2004 Paul H. Simulators 16 August 18th 03 09:25 AM
iPaq screen viewability Raphael Warshaw Soaring 7 July 27th 03 06:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.