![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 07:00:59 +1300, Bruce Hoult
wrote: In article , (chris) wrote: My guess is that a Blended Wing Body is a superior trade off if you have a huge fuselage - as is the case for a large cargo jet such as a C-5 or a big passenger jet. This allows the huge fuselage to also generate lift, it appears to have a lot more wetted area. NZ's CT/4 Airtrainer is a 2-seat piston powered basic trainer reputed to get something like 20% of the lift from the cockpit canopy. It's in service in NZ and Australia and also Hong Kong and Thailand. http://www.kiwiaircraftimages.com/atrainer.html Those who were at the '95 Worlds in Omarama may recall an aerobatic display by an RNZAF team in CT/4s. -- Bruce The BD4 we fly gets 13% of its lift from the fuselage which just happens to be about what the missing bit of wing would produce. Mike Borgelt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|