![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kirk Stant wrote:
I use at least silver distance, specific destination(s), and out of gliding range of the home field to decide what I log as XC. I personally think that differences among gliders are so great that any specific distance measurement is inequitable. So I'm going to stick with my previous definition. But more to the point of this discussion: The real equipment requirement for XC is a good trailer! If you are not willing to land In my experience, a trailer and crew were actually more "costly" than an aero-retrieve. The trailer had no legal lights, no license plate, no brakes, and I had the wrong size hitch. I towed it around the airfield once (on the too small hitch), and convinced myself I'd loaded it right (C.G.) and could do this if I had to. Because I flew on weekdays, when there was less/no competition for the schedule of the glider, crew meant one guy (the towpilot). I always packed the trailer for a retrieve (C.G.) before my flights, but I dreaded ever making someone use it (and getting a traffic ticket!) Instead I flew all my X-C within gliding range of some airport. I even stopped progress on one dying day at 5000 ft AGL with tons of landouts to instead go to an airport with an easy, cheap aero-tow out. I'm a sucker for convenience...and with aerotow rates being so cheap, I had to look at it and since only 1/4 of my X-C has been landouts (at an airport), aerotow each time has been less "costly." I started real XC in a 1-34, and quickly got tired of watching the glassholes fly off into the distance - so I joined them. Sure the 1-34 is a fine XC ship, especially if all your friends are flying similar performance ships, but so is glass. 2-33s, G-103s, ASK-21s are not good XC ships because no-one really uses them for that so they are not usually equipped for it (Instruments, radio, trailer, etc). (there are exceptions, of course...). Kirk I think ease of assembly/disassembly is a big one for me too. I wasn't about to try to disassemble and trailer a 2-33 with two people. Much less the Blanik. Yeah, we have the trailers for that, but all those goshdanged bits and pieces and those heavy wings and MAN could you really screw up an L-13! There are those who say "just get more people!" Yeah, like "poof" I got some kinda majic wand that gives me more money, more time, more manpower to help. I prefer to think that I have done an excellent job making choices that have maximized my enjoyment of this sport with the resources I had available. I should write a book, "the Budget Soarer." ;P Having assembled the PW-5 three dozen times in a year, and helped with a few heavier assemblies, a Russia or Silent or Sparrowhawk is lookin' pretty good to me about now! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cross Country Logging time | Jim | Piloting | 14 | April 21st 04 09:58 PM |
Cross Country glider rentals | Burt Compton | Soaring | 0 | January 10th 04 07:31 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
US cross country flight | S Narayan | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 7th 04 02:58 PM |
US cross country flight | S Narayan | Piloting | 0 | January 7th 04 02:58 PM |