![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() While your thinking outloud, for seeding, wouldn't a handicapped class have less value than if we ran it as an open class? With *reverse seeding* now in the rules, the lower, the better. About 19 guys ain't going to get into Parowan with their 92, or better seeding. On the other hand, if they all had 50, they would make it in. This rule was written to help the new guy, but allowing an excessive number (35) of them in a contest with limited maximum (50) just pushes out a bunch of seeded guys in all the non-sports classes. I hope this rule hits the circular file, next year. PS, Not much interest, so far in a 2-seat class. Open is alive and well at Minden. JJ Sinclair |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Class III vs. Class II medical | G. Sylvester | Piloting | 11 | February 8th 05 06:41 PM |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
One Design viability? | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 41 | December 10th 03 03:27 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |