![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jun 2004 00:09:20 -0700, (Caracole) wrote:
I object to you laying the blame of ruin at the feet of the OO Well Cindy, Karel is only blaming himself ;-) I have to agree with him that it's a silly rule and it does not serve any pupose in a 1000 Km flight. I think that all rules must have a clear purpose. Can anyone explain the purpose of the 10 Km-rule in a 1000 Km flight? A complicating factor is also the very complex airspace structure in our part of the world. BTW this flight is an excellent achievement. Have a look at: http://www.onlinecontest.de/olcphp/2...hp?ref3=119825 It inspired several other contenders to go after the first official 1000 km FAI diploma flown from the Netherlands. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ruud wrote in message . ..
BTW this flight is an excellent achievement. Have a look at: http://www.onlinecontest.de/olcphp/2...hp?ref3=119825 It inspired several other contenders to go after the first official 1000 km FAI diploma flown from the Netherlands. Would it be possible to satisfy the 10km separation between TPs 1 and 3 by judicious use of a "virtual" TP (1 or 3) on this flight? In other words, declare a point 10 km away from TP 1 but on the track for TP 3? Might be fun to play with it in SeeYou. The flying is getting easier; it's the rest that is getting hard! But it's still all a lot of fun. Great flight, BTW. Kirk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|