![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Romeo Delta wrote:
Eric: The man may be a benevolent yea-hoo, My point is that he is not a yea-hoo. but if the yackity-yack airport authority at my public airport gets wind of this and makes having an ELT a condition to operate glider citing precedence, then he's back to plain old yea-hoo status. Get real, please. Your public airport authority doesn't want to get into the business of policing aircraft for equipment the Feds don't even require. If they want to worry about things, there are much larger concerns, starting with a towing operation. Yes, $200-300 now. But how about when the FAA gets tired of all the cheap ELTs going off from hard landings, or changes the rules (never happens) This part has already happened and the rules are in place for 2009. , or a manufacturer goes ot of business, or... If this happens, your ELT will continue to work. If it needs repairs (unlikely - these things are supposed withstand crashes), buy one from another manufacturer. and were eventually stuck with the $1000+ a pop deal. Who knows what the price will be 5 years from now? A guess is the requirement for them will lead to expanded production and lower prices. In any case, the old ones are currently allowed after that, but won't be routinely monitored. And what then is next? TCAS? No. Ed cited liability concerns in his first sentence. But all of a sudden discussing that aspect obscurates the matter. GMAFB! Your stance on the matter referencing your previous posts seems to question the necessity of this ELT mandate. But this last post of your's seems to have you flip-flopping on the matter. What is your definitive position (or do you just relish the opportunity to change sides as a chance to argue)? My position: - the airport owner is within his rights to require an ELT as a condition of use - There is no additional liability to the airport owner or organizers if gliders are NOT required to have them - ELTs are effective in gliders - Requiring them at New Castle contests will not lead to their requirement at other airports around the country - it is very unlikely other contests will require them, as the New Castle situation is unique I have no opinion on whether ELTs should be required at New Castle, because I am not familiar with the situation there. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mandatory ELT specification (N-reg aircraft, 1400kg) | Jürgen Exner | Owning | 4 | January 13th 05 10:07 PM |
Region 4 S: ELT Mandatory | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 14 | June 29th 04 07:38 PM |
Region 4 S: ELT Mandatory | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 4 | June 19th 04 11:40 PM |
Piper Mandatory SB 1051B | Mark S Conway | Owning | 0 | February 21st 04 11:03 PM |
Two Mandatory Truck Accessories (one of which could be aircraft-optional) | Bill Kambic | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 11th 03 08:52 PM |