![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the
have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715, 3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge 302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback and information. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I just updated my Pocket PC comparison web site with some data on the 4705. It looks like it uses the same connectors and cables as recent iPAQs so I'm guessing it will work OK with a 302. I have ordered one for my testing. They are scheduled to be available on October 6th. The bad news is they obviously do not fit into an iPAQ expansion pack and therefore won't fit into the very nice iPAQ cradles that are available. http://www.cumlus-soaring.com/ppc.htm Pocket PC Comparison http://www.cumlus-soaring.com/cumulus.htm iPAQ Cradles Thanks, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "Jacek Kobiesa" wrote in message om... There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715, 3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge 302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback and information. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the product managers for those things is a member of the Soaring Club
of Houston. Ramke, are you out there? Care to comment? Brent "Jacek Kobiesa" wrote in message om... There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715, 3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge 302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback and information. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jacek Kobiesa" wrote in message
om... There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715, 3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge 302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback and information. Any program that ran on previous versions of iPaq will run on the new ones (check for presence of serial interface though). Display resolution defaults to 240x320 for these programs. Whether there is any advantage to higher resolution for soaring is in my mind questionable. In a cockpit one can hardly see the color screens in any case, making features smaller will just make things worse. 10% increase in display size is not enugh to compensate. (Disclaimer) Have not seen the new iPaqs in action. Henryk Birecki |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sony has just released the first PDA with an
OLED display. It's a PalmOS device that probably won't be sold in the US. But the technology for a huge improvement in sun light visability seems very close. http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200409/04-048E/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like it displays black in a studio very well...
running ducking & grinning Brent "David" wrote in message m... Sony has just released the first PDA with an OLED display. It's a PalmOS device that probably won't be sold in the US. But the technology for a huge improvement in sun light visability seems very close. http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200409/04-048E/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Henryk,
As a developer, aren't you able to use the pixels in the best possible way? So if you have four times as many pixels you can form the characters better and shrink them a little with the same readability?? That plus the extra diagonal size should give us quite a lot more info to see on the display at the same (yes - inadequate . . ) legibility. Within the current HP range (assuming that the H555x days are nearly over) HP buyers can only choose between 3.5" and the 4" with it's high resolution 640x480 display. That's a big difference in area and a four fold increase in 'detail'. Looking forward to hearing of Paul's appraisal. Any one else able to see one? Cheers, Jim Kelly "Henryk Birecki" wrote in message news ![]() message om... There is a new format of iPAQs. I just look at HP web site and the have new (at least new to me and my knowledge) iPAQ 4705, 3715, 3115,etc. Does anyone know how they work with WinPilot and Cambridge 302 for example? How about those digital iPAQs? Looking for feedback and information. Any program that ran on previous versions of iPaq will run on the new ones (check for presence of serial interface though). Display resolution defaults to 240x320 for these programs. Whether there is any advantage to higher resolution for soaring is in my mind questionable. In a cockpit one can hardly see the color screens in any case, making features smaller will just make things worse. 10% increase in display size is not enugh to compensate. (Disclaimer) Have not seen the new iPaqs in action. Henryk Birecki |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes Jim,
In principle one can trade things off. As a matter of fact GPS_LOG WinCE will allow you to make some tradeoffs exactly because the display is somewhat larger. But, at least I, will leave font clarity management to Microsoft ![]() like. I will still stick to my 1550 for as long as I can. Henryk Birecki "Jim Kelly" wrote: Hi Henryk, As a developer, aren't you able to use the pixels in the best possible way? So if you have four times as many pixels you can form the characters better and shrink them a little with the same readability?? That plus the extra diagonal size should give us quite a lot more info to see on the display at the same (yes - inadequate . . ) legibility. Within the current HP range (assuming that the H555x days are nearly over) HP buyers can only choose between 3.5" and the 4" with it's high resolution 640x480 display. That's a big difference in area and a four fold increase in 'detail'. Looking forward to hearing of Paul's appraisal. Any one else able to see one? Cheers, Jim Kelly |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
iPaq and LX5000 connectivity question (hardware?) | Ted Wagner | Soaring | 1 | April 22nd 04 09:29 PM |
Commercial - iPAQ Cradle Changes | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | April 9th 04 03:29 PM |
iPaq wiring, cradles and mounts for gliders - Ideas?? | Jim Kelly | Soaring | 12 | December 4th 03 11:45 PM |
iPAQ h2210/h2215 Review | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | September 3rd 03 03:45 AM |
iPaq screen viewability | Raphael Warshaw | Soaring | 7 | July 27th 03 06:02 PM |