![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was flying a Ka 7 in a very strong wind condition. At stall speed up wind
it appeard to have no forward ground speed. At 900ft above ground i started my circuit and at about 700 ft on downwind i passed the start of the runway and did a base and finals in a slow turn. At finals i looked down to the start of the runway at about 45degrees. The wind blow me past the runway (downwind) aprox 300 meters. I realized that i would not make it back at my rate of decent and forward motion.Before me was nowhere to land as it was only threes . I decided to change my alltitude for speed and out of the headwind and into ground effect. The last few moment was nailbiting as i had to get over 2 fences and a road but made it. My point: If there is no headwind it will be better to approach at beast glide angle as ground effect will be slightly cancelled by profile drag due to higer speed. If you have a strong head wind it will help to get out of the wind and use ground affect. Regards Andre "CV" wrote in message ... First a disclaimer: I understand the security issues involved in the following and would not encourage anyone to try this at home, but I am interested in the theoretical side of it. Imagine you get things wrong and are caught out low on final, still a fair distance out, and it looks marginal whether you are going to reach the runway or not. One technique I have sometimes heard described is to dive for the deck and complete the remaining distance in ground effect. For the sake of the argument we can assume fairly flat ground, free of obstacles, though not necessarily landable. The advantages claimed are usually better glide performance in ground effect and less headwind and absence of downdrafts close to the ground. On the other hand you'll be travelling at higher than optimal airspeed for most of the distance. I am wondering how much truth there actually is to this technique. Would it significantly increase your range and improve your chances of reaching the field or not ? Would it perhaps work better against a strong wind gradient (as I suspect it might), and maybe not help a lot in calm conditions ? I'd be interested in any hard data/analysis or otherwise enlightening comments on this. Please note though, that I am not talking about high-speed competition finishes, rounded off with a beatup and a sharp pullup and all the dangers and other issues involved in that. Cheers CV |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Meredith Effect | Corky Scott | Home Built | 19 | September 4th 04 04:01 PM |
Toronto Area Glider Pilot Ground School Starts Thu. March 25, 2004 | Ulf | Soaring | 0 | March 3rd 04 05:02 PM |
Wing in Ground Effect? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 10 | December 18th 03 05:11 AM |
Why did Britain win the BoB? | Grantland | Military Aviation | 79 | October 15th 03 03:34 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |