![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No details on the insurer, or if the pilot needs a twin engine rating
Insured by Costello, higher than normal rates because it is used for air show work. No multi engine rating needed or held because there is no such thing in the FAA world as a multi engine glider. Robert Mudd |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Robertmudd1u wrote: No details on the insurer, or if the pilot needs a twin engine rating Insured by Costello, higher than normal rates because it is used for air show work. No multi engine rating needed or held because there is no such thing in the FAA world as a multi engine glider. Dang. Now that IS fantastic. Costello should get a reeeel nice Christmas card for being so reasonable. I was aware that there is no FAA cat/class requirement for multi-engine single-place experimental turbine glider in the general CFR's ![]() flexibility is reassuring. I'd sure love to see performance data on this aircraft: climb rates and speeds, fuel consumption, acceleration to rotation, etc... Good for you guys! I'm going to absolutely have to see this act at an airshow at some point. Oct 2,3 at Kingman, AZ 2005. Hmmm...maybe we need to get him all the way out to Calif. before that ![]() It also seems pretty clear that if two 45# thrust engines can do this to a 660# total flying weight glider, one 45# thrust engine may be enough for a 400# total flying weight glider. And talk about safer: I can't imagine the turbine drag is more than a prop, so engine failures at launch should be less dramatic. Thanks for the response, Robert. Cheers to you... -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I was aware that there is no FAA cat/class requirement for multi-engine single-place experimental turbine glider in the general CFR's ![]() flexibility is reassuring. I'd sure love to see performance data on this aircraft: climb rates and speeds, fuel consumption, acceleration to rotation, etc... Good for you guys! I'm going to absolutely have to see this act at an airshow at some point. Oct 2,3 at Kingman, AZ 2005. Hmmm...maybe we need to get him all the way out to Calif. before that He is talking about it at the Convention in Ontario, CA in February. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
p3/95 | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 1 | September 27th 04 12:27 AM |
Stop The Noise petitions FAA to increase N number size | Earl Grieda | Piloting | 19 | April 26th 04 04:46 AM |
Motorgliders (long) | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 98 | October 9th 03 10:11 PM |