![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One difference is USHGA's protection of dealers/instructors
at the expense of the general membership. I was a founding USHGA member and continued for about 20 years even after becoming inactive in the sport. My reason for dropping membership was a new rule (at that time) that you had to sign a waiver during renewal that absolved instructors of all damages in the event of an accident even if it was due to negligence on the part of the instructor. Although I have never sued anyone in my life I thought that was over the top. Perhaps the waiver requirement has since been dropped. At 22:30 08 January 2005, Eric Greenwell wrote: wrote: Bad Decision #2, The hang gliders came to us and wanted to join as a division of the SSA. What did we say? No way------we don't wan't anything to do with those uncertified things, why ther're nothing but lawn chairs hung under bed sheets. That was over 30 years ago, and I don't think it was a bad decision then. Hang gliders were VERY different from sailplanes, with much lower performance, not 'getting close' like they are today. No way to hold events together, really, and they don't care about airports and we do, we can't use their winches or towplanes or instructors and vice versa, and so on. I suspect the personalities of the pilots were very different, too, since the sport (back then) attracted people that were more 'adventuresome' and not so tolerant of official regulation as sailplane pilots. It was definitely a much more dangerous sport then, and that might reflected unfavorably on the SSA. What did the hang gliders do? They formed their own association and I believe they have something like 4 times the membership we now enjoy (11,306) According their website, they had about 10,000 members in 2002. So, where are we now and what can we do? First off, solving our problems doesn't have anything to do with moving the office. Secondly, merging with EAA or AOPA won't solve a thing-------all that will do is to insure the loss of our idenity. I agree with this - this 'solution' has come up several times over the last 20 years, and this is the conclusion each time. We must hang in there and tough it out. I contribute $100 bucks a year to the coffers, partially because I know my life membership was sold way too cheap. If we get to the point where we can no longer pay the bills-----------we might consider asking the hang gliders if we could become a division of the USHGA. I think the two sports and pilots are closer now than then, so perhaps more interaction would benefit both groups, but frankly, I don't even know how much interaction there is now. -- Change 'netto' to 'net' to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed | What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe | Naval Aviation | 5 | August 21st 04 12:50 AM |
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed | What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe | Military Aviation | 3 | August 21st 04 12:40 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
Yep - 9-11 attacks predicted in 1994 | Laura Bush murdered her boy friend | Military Aviation | 172 | April 20th 04 02:20 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |