![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IIUC, the B-2 and F-117 rely on continuous feedback and control,
they could not be flown without computers. So how do lifting bodies and Flying Wings like the facetmobile or the Chance-Vought V-173 "Flying Flapjack" maintain roll stability? They appear to have no or negative dihedral. -- FF |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message om... IIUC, the B-2 and F-117 rely on continuous feedback and control, they could not be flown without computers. So how do lifting bodies and Flying Wings like the facetmobile or the Chance-Vought V-173 "Flying Flapjack" maintain roll stability? They appear to have no or negative dihedral. -- FF Having helped build and test fly a flying wing, maybe I can help. To the roll stability question there are two answers. 1. You don't really need roll stability as long as you don't have real roll instability. Pilots can easily keep the wings level. 2. Sweep back has the same effect as dihedral. Sometimes the dihedral effect of sweep is so strong that anthedral (negative dihedral) is needed to give the aircraft maneuverability. Pitch stability comes mainly from the airfoil choice. Or, in the case of swept back flying wings, from wing twist. Sometimes, it's a combination of both. Yaw stability and control is the big problem of flying wings. Here, computer stability augmentation is very useful. Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A few months ago I read a fantastic article about this very subject in an
aviation magazine, but for the life of me I can't remember which one. It was written by one of the test pilots who flew Northrop's flying wings. VERY, VERY interesting reading. It was one of the magazines that specialized on WWII aircraft subjects. Anybody else remember seeing this? "Bill Daniels" wrote in message news:Es4sd.605454$mD.500572@attbi_s02... "Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message om... IIUC, the B-2 and F-117 rely on continuous feedback and control, they could not be flown without computers. So how do lifting bodies and Flying Wings like the facetmobile or the Chance-Vought V-173 "Flying Flapjack" maintain roll stability? They appear to have no or negative dihedral. -- FF Having helped build and test fly a flying wing, maybe I can help. To the roll stability question there are two answers. 1. You don't really need roll stability as long as you don't have real roll instability. Pilots can easily keep the wings level. 2. Sweep back has the same effect as dihedral. Sometimes the dihedral effect of sweep is so strong that anthedral (negative dihedral) is needed to give the aircraft maneuverability. Pitch stability comes mainly from the airfoil choice. Or, in the case of swept back flying wings, from wing twist. Sometimes, it's a combination of both. Yaw stability and control is the big problem of flying wings. Here, computer stability augmentation is very useful. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | February 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 04 06:27 AM |