![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the 180 day requirement would actually
result in the sale of MORE parachutes, and an increase in their use. USPA among others seems to have figured this out too. The vast improvements in materials and techniques for manufacture have really made the 120 day requirement silly. In article .com, wrote: Yes. This push for 180 days repack cycle is in place for past 4 or 5 years. The Parachute Industry Association, the USPA are all pushing for that. In Europe the repack cycle right now is 180 days and there are no problems. If we can get more organizations like the SSA and AOPA to support that, maybe the FAA will change its bureaucratic approach and make the changes to the FARs. The fact of the matter is that I have not seen a modern parachute with a mold or fungus issue even though I repacked quite a few rigs. It just doesn't happen. But on the other hand tandem jumps were made in the U.S. for over 20 years before the FAA accepted the findings and change the rules. Go figure. -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Emergency Parachute questions | Jay Moreland | Aerobatics | 14 | December 3rd 04 05:46 PM |
National 360 parachute repack... | Tomasz Sielicki | Soaring | 1 | June 3rd 04 01:02 PM |
Cirrus BRS deployments - Alan Klapmeier's comments on NPR | Dan Luke | Piloting | 67 | April 25th 04 04:31 PM |
Parachute repack questions | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 20 | April 23rd 04 02:13 PM |
Parachute repack date revisited | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 7 | March 16th 04 02:12 AM |