A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sharing static and pitot line



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 05, 12:02 PM
John Giddy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 7 Mar 2005 00:08:47 -0800, Istvan Csonka wrote:

Dear All,
I have seen several posts about how to share the TE line between
e-vario and mechanical one. Maybe I am wrong but I can not see any
post about sharing the pitot pressure (dynamic) between ASI, e-vario
(computer) and and the only one static port between e-vario, altimeter
and mechanical vario.
Any good advice or this is not a problem at all ?


The altimeter doesn't need to be connected to a static port unless you
plan on pressurising your glider ;-)
The most important instrument on the static port is the ASI, as this
measures very small changes in pressure, and the fluctuations in
cockpit pressure will make the ASI reading almost useless.
A vario on the static port will give you a completely uncompensated
vario. This is sometimes done for motorgliders to provide a VSI for
climbing under power, but would be unusual these days in a pure
glider. A vario using a capacity on the static line could give
transient errors on the ASI due to resistance in the tubing. If you
really want to do this, separate the tubes for ASI and vario as close
to the static port as possible to reduce common impedance.
Sharing the pitot line seems to be less of a problem, particularly if
the "e-vario" is a pressure one rather than a capacity type. However
if the e-vario is a flow-meter type with a typical 1 pint capacity, it
would be a good idea to separate the tubes as close to the pitot tube
as possible, for the same reason as separating the tubes to different
instruments from the static port or TE probe.
Cheers, John G.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why are TE probes so long? Duane Eisenbeiss Soaring 36 May 9th 04 06:58 AM
Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service running with scissors Military Aviation 79 March 3rd 04 01:48 PM
Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service running with scissors Instrument Flight Rules 64 March 3rd 04 05:01 AM
Chuck Yeager-pitot tube Ron Military Aviation 44 October 9th 03 03:13 AM
Pitot and static couplings for a TTU-205 B2431 Home Built 0 August 15th 03 07:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.