If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
old hoodoo wrote:
Rob Arndt wrote: No, Syria first. Let's see a show of hands of how many people here would like to see Damascus up in smoke? Rob We're off on the road to Damascus! Would make a great Bob Hope/Bing Crosby sequel to the road movies. Story of two imbedded correspondent's who find adventure, romance, and comedy on the road to Damascus while searching for the dread WMD's. The dry Wolf Blitzer could reprise the Bing Crosby role ...and who is funny enough to play Bob Hope? Geraldo???? Maybe Khadafi could put in a cameo role as a sidekick or a camel. I have never heard Wolf sing, although I have heard wolves sing. How about the ever-nominated Jon Stewart as the Bob Hope role? And he has a background in fake news. He would fit in with this news group, as he told Brian Williams the other night his group never checks facts. No, Tony Blair and George Bush cannot be in the film. That would be too much ham in one movie. Ok, I guess they could be in one or two scenes for additional comic relief. They could be running hither and there turning up stones at random, saying, "Just one more stone and we will find them." What would an overdose of ham do to a Moslem-themed picture? I am appalled that the Coalition, which my Rogets' tells me can be in cahoots, haven't come up with a WMD even if they had to bring it in from outside. As a sequel can have the Road to Tehran, then the Road to Pyongyang (that's a mouthfull)....then the crowning sequel....the Road to Peking! Perhaps we could outsource and pay the Chinese to invade themselves. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Jack Linthicum" wrote in message ups.com... old hoodoo wrote: Rob Arndt wrote: No, Syria first. Let's see a show of hands of how many people here would like to see Damascus up in smoke? Rob We're off on the road to Damascus! Would make a great Bob Hope/Bing Crosby sequel to the road movies. Story of two imbedded correspondent's who find adventure, romance, and comedy on the road to Damascus while searching for the dread WMD's. The dry Wolf Blitzer could reprise the Bing Crosby role ...and who is funny enough to play Bob Hope? Geraldo???? Maybe Khadafi could put in a cameo role as a sidekick or a camel. I have never heard Wolf sing, although I have heard wolves sing. How about the ever-nominated Jon Stewart as the Bob Hope role? And he has a background in fake news. He would fit in with this news group, as he told Brian Williams the other night his group never checks facts. With you apparently leading the charge, having just told us that the 2001 QDR resulted in our having reduced the requirement for "armored divisions" and that having a detrimental effect on our security posture--when in fact no "armored divisions" or for that matter any other kind of divisions, have been eliminated or reduced in size/capability since 2001. In fact, with the "Unit of Action" concept, we are seeing *more* ground maneuver elements being fielded than we had in 2001! Brooks snip |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Jack Linthicum wrote: old hoodoo wrote: Rob Arndt wrote: No, Syria first. Let's see a show of hands of how many people here would like to see Damascus up in smoke? Rob We're off on the road to Damascus! Would make a great Bob Hope/Bing Crosby sequel to the road movies. Story of two imbedded correspondent's who find adventure, romance, and comedy on the road to Damascus while searching for the dread WMD's. The dry Wolf Blitzer could reprise the Bing Crosby role ...and who is funny enough to play Bob Hope? Geraldo???? Maybe Khadafi could put in a cameo role as a sidekick or a camel. I have never heard Wolf sing, although I have heard wolves sing. How about the ever-nominated Jon Stewart as the Bob Hope role? And he has a background in fake news. He would fit in with this news group, as he told Brian Williams the other night his group never checks facts. No, Tony Blair and George Bush cannot be in the film. That would be too much ham in one movie. Ok, I guess they could be in one or two scenes for additional comic relief. They could be running hither and there turning up stones at random, saying, "Just one more stone and we will find them." What would an overdose of ham do to a Moslem-themed picture? I am appalled that the Coalition, which my Rogets' tells me can be in cahoots, haven't come up with a WMD even if they had to bring it in from outside. As a sequel can have the Road to Tehran, then the Road to Pyongyang (that's a mouthfull)....then the crowning sequel....the Road to Peking! Perhaps we could outsource and pay the Chinese to invade themselves. Are you bucking to be the director with all of these very good suggestions? I feel terrible that I mentioned the pork merely by accident when I should have done so intentionally. What bothers me about Jon Stewart is that he often gets closer to the basic truth than the "real" media who supposedly checks facts. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:43:39 -0600, old hoodoo
wrote: Jack Linthicum wrote: old hoodoo wrote: Rob Arndt wrote: No, Syria first. Let's see a show of hands of how many people here would like to see Damascus up in smoke? Rob We're off on the road to Damascus! Would make a great Bob Hope/Bing Crosby sequel to the road movies. Story of two imbedded correspondent's who find adventure, romance, and comedy on the road to Damascus while searching for the dread WMD's. The dry Wolf Blitzer could reprise the Bing Crosby role ...and who is funny enough to play Bob Hope? Geraldo???? Maybe Khadafi could put in a cameo role as a sidekick or a camel. I have never heard Wolf sing, although I have heard wolves sing. How about the ever-nominated Jon Stewart as the Bob Hope role? And he has a background in fake news. He would fit in with this news group, as he told Brian Williams the other night his group never checks facts. No, Tony Blair and George Bush cannot be in the film. That would be too much ham in one movie. Ok, I guess they could be in one or two scenes for additional comic relief. They could be running hither and there turning up stones at random, saying, "Just one more stone and we will find them." What would an overdose of ham do to a Moslem-themed picture? I am appalled that the Coalition, which my Rogets' tells me can be in cahoots, haven't come up with a WMD even if they had to bring it in from outside. As a sequel can have the Road to Tehran, then the Road to Pyongyang (that's a mouthfull)....then the crowning sequel....the Road to Peking! Perhaps we could outsource and pay the Chinese to invade themselves. Are you bucking to be the director with all of these very good suggestions? I feel terrible that I mentioned the pork merely by accident when I should have done so intentionally. What bothers me about Jon Stewart is that he often gets closer to the basic truth than the "real" media who supposedly checks facts. The only outright, unlabelled lie Jon tells is the one about not checking. Peter Skelton |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SCOTT RITTER SAYS U.S. PLANS JUNE ATTACK ON IRAN | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 1 | February 22nd 05 05:06 PM |
Iran's nuclear program | Thelasian | Military Aviation | 107 | August 31st 04 06:35 AM |
Please Israel come to Iran... | X98 | Military Aviation | 1 | May 13th 04 09:47 PM |
Iran Says 'Complete Story' Given to Inspectors | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 0 | April 25th 04 12:42 PM |
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |