![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave S" wrote in message
ink.net... Ok... I am a firm believer in private property and courtesy... However.. if this is a PRIVATE field then the city cops have no business enforcing what amounts to "traffic laws" on this PRIVATE PROPERTY. You cant get a speeding ticket for ignoring a stop sign on a private road or in a private parking lot...because city traffic rules dont apply there. Minor nit: if the private property owner asks for traffic laws to be enforced, they may be. For example, at a local business campus, some roads are private. But speed and stop sign enforcement has been done in the past, on request to the local law enforcement. More relevant to this particular discussion, note that the laws are actually part of the zoning regulations, and violations are criminal offenses, not infractions (as one might expect). There is plenty of precedence for such laws being enforced on private property. But, semantics aside.. this is a small affluent town, with a small affluent town mentality, that stacks the deck against the out of towner who cuts it close. I think it would be WONDERFUL if they put in an ASOS of some kind and tied an "airport closed" message to a photo cell... I certainly agree that the necessary information needs to be made available to the pilot. Your idea of an ASOS with a notice as to whether the airport is open or closed is an excellent one. But, my bet is that most "violations" occur either just before or just after sunset, and inasmuch as the arrests are probably a decent money maker for the city, there's probably not much support for spending public money for the benefit of the private airport. I also think that given the criminal nature of the offense, an arrest needs to be accompanied by more than just the officer's statement. Real proof of violation needs to be provided. Finally, I think it's absurd that a violation of even a half hour could be considered legitimate, given the likely true nature of the regulation (noise abatement). Aeronautical safety must be given highest precedence, and an allowance for the sometimes variable nature of flight times must be made. As I mentioned before, I suspect anyone who cared enough could actually take a violation through the court system and come out on top. But you need someone willing to pursue it that far, without any guarantee of winning. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Austin, TX | James Blakely | Owning | 18 | December 11th 04 09:22 PM |
Austin, TX | James Blakely | Piloting | 18 | December 11th 04 09:22 PM |
Anybody know Capital Aircraft Sales, Lakeway TX??? | Jim | Owning | 0 | August 4th 03 01:44 PM |