A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pardon me, but this is the kind of bull**** that's killing GA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 16th 05, 04:29 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"A.Coleman" wrote in message
m...

Please read this. This is what's killing GA and we ought to do something
about it.


http://www.cdapress.com/articles/200...ews/news04.prt

and this

http://www.news4jax.com/news/4269212/detail.html#



Please take it for what its worth -- a money grab. Even if on your worse
days you have a bone to pick with ATC, recognize that these lawsuit
outcomes are not truly about the truth or whose at fault; its about who
has the deep pockets. The ultimate question is: what's the PICs
responsibility? These outcomes blame ATC. If the pilot were to have been
presented during his written exam with hypothetical questions encompassing
the same facts, what do you think his answers would have been if the
choices were either to blame the PIC or to blame ATC?


It doesn't look like a money grab to me. There are many suits without merit
that win big bucks, but this doesn't appear to be one of them. The
controller made a fundamental error and two people were killed as a result.


  #2  
Old March 16th 05, 06:07 AM
Mike Granby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


But the NTSB report won't be admissible, right?

They'll have to argue the case de novo.

  #3  
Old March 16th 05, 06:12 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe that is correct.. NTSB reports are for safety reporting.. and not
admissible in a court of law.. or else no one would talk to the NTSB and
we'd never figure out what went wrong and how to correct it.

BT

"Mike Granby" wrote in message
ups.com...

But the NTSB report won't be admissible, right?

They'll have to argue the case de novo.



  #4  
Old March 16th 05, 01:11 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Granby wrote:
But the NTSB report won't be admissible, right?

They would argue it de novo anyhow. However the NTSB tells them
what to say pretty much.


  #5  
Old March 16th 05, 05:28 PM
xyzzy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Granby wrote:

But the NTSB report won't be admissible, right?


I don't think accident reports of any type are admissable since they are
always heresay -- filled out by a person who did not witness the accident.

I suppose that because I was on a jury for a lawsuit involving a car
crash and when the cop's report was "shown" to us, everything was
blacked out except the date, location, and names of the parties involved.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What kind of pod is it? [email protected] Naval Aviation 12 February 23rd 05 08:53 AM
can anyone tell me what kind of airplane this is? Vigo Carpath Owning 5 June 5th 04 08:09 AM
This is why we train (kind of long) SD Piloting 38 January 20th 04 04:06 PM
A different kind of flight school John Harlow Piloting 3 August 18th 03 08:35 PM
New kind of helicopter? John Ross Piloting 10 August 15th 03 03:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.