![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave B" wrote in message news:UMr_d.712770$6l.575085@pd7tw2no... This IS your tax dollars at work too pal!! I believe you missed the sarcasm in Tony's post. Although I don't agree with everything this guy says and the justice system is supposed to work for everyone, something went terribly wrong Perhaps I'm wrong, but this remark seems founded on a belief that the verdict was erroneous. Unless you sat through all the testimony and examined the evidence, you would not have a basis for such a belief, except perhaps the common misconception that 'if they're charged, they musta done it!'. In simple fact, the judge who did sit through the testimony and did weigh the evidence did not agree that the Crown made their case. The judge did not feel that the allegations against the accused were supported by the testimony and evidence. That's what he's there for. If there was not a sufficient case, and the accused were not convicted, then something went right here. Though we'd all like to see that the perpetrators of this crime are brought to justice, it does not follow from this outcome that this will not come to pass, nor that anyone will get off scott free. Perhaps more evidence will be discovered or more advanced analysis techniques to interpret the existing evidence, and the path will lead onward to other people. Perhaps not. It might also be that the perpetrators are never found nor convicted. There might just be not enough evidence to track down and convict anyone. If this is so, it also does not follow that the investigation was bungled, as some others have suggested; it might just be that there is no evidence to be found. Crimes go un-solved everyday - just because this crime involved the deaths of so many people does not change that. a couple of guys got away with murder!! There is no disputing this! Yes there is. This remark implies that because these accused were not convicted that 'a couple of guys got away with murder'. If no one is ever convicted of this crime then someone will have 'got away with murder' - but this does not necessarily follow from this particular verdict. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 11:46 PM |
| Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 4 | March 23rd 04 12:19 AM |
| Why did Britain win the BoB? | Grantland | Military Aviation | 79 | October 15th 03 04:34 PM |
| 04 Oct 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 4th 03 08:51 PM |
| 18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 04:47 AM |