![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It isn't meant to address the known problems of the finish gate, but to
explore the unknowns of the cylinder. A final control turn point is a good idea in my opinion. I don't think the rules exculde its use. It is a choice... easily implemented by a CD who listens to the opinions of competitors. The decision to fly through the gate or roll is hardly split second. If you are below your safety altitude at four miles out and less than 100 knots, the decision has already been made. That's when you should be calling a rolling finish and navigating appropriately. A rolling finish needn't be used only when a belly flop onto the nearest bit or runway is your best option. My rolling finishes usually involve an application of spoilers so I'll land well short of the traffic around the gate. There are situations where we are pulling up on the stick during the last several thousand feet to the airport fence, but this has absolutely nothing to do with finish gates. The band of energy you need to be in to complete a safe pattern insertion from 50 feet agl is pretty wide, from 100 knots up to redline. If you find yourself unable to measure this until you are already within the airport boundaries, you need to work on this skill. Clearly, we are discussing this because there are pilots attending races who cannot do this. I can hear the argument. Why should I get better at the finish gate. It's an unsafe artifact from an earlier era of the sport. Fine. But the lack of skill demonstrated in today's finish gate will find its way to the finish cylinder - same cause, different effects. I guess I'm making the argument that guns don't kill, people do. Pretty hard to swallow for a captial "L" liberal like me (please, not to be confused with a Democrat!). Marc, I guess it comes down to this... CDs can solve one of the problems. The other, to me, is like making the decision to land out. You can either admit at some safe altitude that the risk of continuing the search for lift is too great and get on with making a safe pattern, or you can wait until a safe landing is nearly impossible. Same type of judgement for the finish gate, slightly different set of skills. OC Checking out again for the next few weeks. Back channel if you come up with anything inspired. Cheers, Chris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seniors Contest | Bob Fidler | Soaring | 68 | March 17th 05 03:50 AM |
Why does the Sporting code require "Goal" to be a finish point??? | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 31 | October 18th 04 10:31 PM |
TAT scoring question | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 34 | September 6th 04 04:55 AM |
Carbon Fiber - Achieving Glossy Finish w/o GelCoat | RKT | Home Built | 7 | March 8th 04 06:15 AM |
Start Anywhere Cylinder (SSA rules proposal) | Mark Navarre | Soaring | 15 | September 25th 03 01:13 PM |