A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Finish Gate Accident no. 2



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old March 27th 05, 04:42 PM
BB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


M B wrote:
It occurs to me that if someone is on final glide at
the end of a competition, they may pick a speed (like
85 knots) which their computer says is optimal for
points, but which is both:

1) too fast for a rolling finish/landing
and
2) too slow for a pull up, turn around, and landing.

Is that an accurate assessment? Would a competition
pilot be put in a situation where he must decide between
points and safety of the landing?


This is exactly right. The mathematically optimal point score comes
when you cross the finish (50 feet, middle of the airport) at the
regular inter-thermal glide speed, 70-80 kts rather than 130. This is
of course about the worst place from which to start a sensible pattern,
especially when 50 other guys are doing the same thing at the same
time. You see fast finishes because most of us are a bit chicken and
hold some reserve, losing a few points in the process.

Everyone in these threads has been advocating "just do a rolling finish
if it seems touchy" but that's a hard decision too. The finish gate is
typically downwind, so the following pattern is only a 180 to land into
the wind. Thus, a rolling finish is a downwind landing, often in a
substantial wind, with a huge fleet landing in the opposite direction.


Furthermore the pilot in the typical marginal situation, with enough
energy to cross the gate at 50-100 feet with 70-80 kts, has to
dissipate a lot of energy to roll a finish at the far end of the
runway. If not, this pilot would cross the runway threshold at say
100-200 feet and 80 kts. At this point it's really too late to roll
(remember all those guys landing into the wind at the other end of the
runway!) and you don't have enough energy to do a proper flying finish.
Coffin corner.

So the decision to roll - accept a downwind landing into the face of
traffic - has to be made at least a mile or two out, while there is
still substantial energy left and a good chance of picking up 50-100
feet of energy, or misjudging your total energy by 50-100 feet. I think
I can start to sympathize with people who get in this mess.

John Cochrane
BB

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 05:39 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.