![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() M B wrote: It occurs to me that if someone is on final glide at the end of a competition, they may pick a speed (like 85 knots) which their computer says is optimal for points, but which is both: 1) too fast for a rolling finish/landing and 2) too slow for a pull up, turn around, and landing. Is that an accurate assessment? Would a competition pilot be put in a situation where he must decide between points and safety of the landing? This is exactly right. The mathematically optimal point score comes when you cross the finish (50 feet, middle of the airport) at the regular inter-thermal glide speed, 70-80 kts rather than 130. This is of course about the worst place from which to start a sensible pattern, especially when 50 other guys are doing the same thing at the same time. You see fast finishes because most of us are a bit chicken and hold some reserve, losing a few points in the process. Everyone in these threads has been advocating "just do a rolling finish if it seems touchy" but that's a hard decision too. The finish gate is typically downwind, so the following pattern is only a 180 to land into the wind. Thus, a rolling finish is a downwind landing, often in a substantial wind, with a huge fleet landing in the opposite direction. Furthermore the pilot in the typical marginal situation, with enough energy to cross the gate at 50-100 feet with 70-80 kts, has to dissipate a lot of energy to roll a finish at the far end of the runway. If not, this pilot would cross the runway threshold at say 100-200 feet and 80 kts. At this point it's really too late to roll (remember all those guys landing into the wind at the other end of the runway!) and you don't have enough energy to do a proper flying finish. Coffin corner. So the decision to roll - accept a downwind landing into the face of traffic - has to be made at least a mile or two out, while there is still substantial energy left and a good chance of picking up 50-100 feet of energy, or misjudging your total energy by 50-100 feet. I think I can start to sympathize with people who get in this mess. John Cochrane BB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |