![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How
do you explain it? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com, Fred
writes Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? I've always thought of it as a change in the lift drag vector. If your glider is flying in still air the lift drag vector is pointing up and towards the tail. If rising air is entered, which effectively increases the lift vector the new lift/drag vector points slightly more forward than previously. This reduces the effective drag and the glider accelerates until everything balances out again. This may be total rubbish but it is the model I've found easiest to visualise. Robin -- Robin Birch |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robin Birch wrote:
In message .com, Fred writes Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? I've always thought of it as a change in the lift drag vector. If your glider is flying in still air the lift drag vector is pointing up and towards the tail. If rising air is entered, which effectively increases the lift vector the new lift/drag vector points slightly more forward than previously. This reduces the effective drag and the glider accelerates until everything balances out again. This may be total rubbish but it is the model I've found easiest to visualise. Sounds good to me. Your explanation would seem to require (to me at least) some pitching down to make everything balance out. I've not noticed this (maybe too excited that I've found lift). Comments from someone more observant? Shawn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have the stick in a fixed position, this translates to a fixed
AOA. If you move from still or sinking air into lift, your AOA will go up momentarily. Assuming you do nothing with the stick, the aircraft will seek and return to its configured AOA, which will result in a slight pitch down of the nose and a slight increase in speed. Said another way, the increased angle of attack also affects the horizontal stabilizer, which mometarily produces more lift, pitching the nose over slightly, with resulting increase in speed. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Fred wrote: Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? ================================================== ======================== I'll stick my neck out on this. In gliding flight, the horizontal component of lift is our "thrust" that enables an airspeed, while the vertical component is equal to the weight of the glider. Once the thermal is entered, there is an increase in the total lift vector equal to strength of the thermal. This results in an imbalance of forces which causes the glider to accelerate to the new steady state. I flew for years on the east coast of the US and never noticed this effect until moving out west. Estrella has some strong days were this effect is very noticable, especially in clean ships. The lowly 233 exhibits the same effect, just not as noticable. Terry Claussen Master CFI |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry: That's the way I explained it too, (& BTW, the phenomenon is
noticeable in the east too). There should be a more elegant (or simplistic) explanation, don't you think? One that doesn't require diagrams of lift vectors? Fred |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred,
The thermal is giving you "free lift". Since the wing now doesn't produce as much lift, induced drag is simultaneously reduced. With reduced drag, airspeed increases. Hope this helps, Brad On 27 Mar 2005 09:33:53 -0800, "Fred" wrote: Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm...
I thought that if the CG is forward, a 'bump' in lift is behind it (where the wing center of pressure is maybe) and so the wing is accelerated up and the nose pitches down. Try it with drastically different CG. I tried it with a 240# guy up front. Big difference from the 160# guy up front. Anyway, that's my take on it... At 00:00 28 March 2005, Terry wrote: Fred wrote: Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? ================================================= ================= ======== I'll stick my neck out on this. In gliding flight, the horizontal component of lift is our 'thrust' that enables an airspeed, while the vertical component is equal to the weight of the glider. Once the thermal is entered, there is an increase in the total lift vector equal to strength of the thermal. This results in an imbalance of forces which causes the glider to accelerate to the new steady state. I flew for years on the east coast of the US and never noticed this effect until moving out west. Estrella has some strong days were this effect is very noticable, especially in clean ships. The lowly 233 exhibits the same effect, just not as noticable. Terry Claussen Master CFI Mark J. Boyd |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's called the Yates Effect and the mechanism described
by Yates in Gliding magazine in 1951 is basically an expanded version of what Robin says. Derek Piggot has an Appendix on the subject in Understanding Gliding. The inverse is also the explanation for the more important phenomenon (in terms of thermallling and final turn stall/spin safety) of the loss of airspeed when we hit sink John Galloway At 21:30 27 March 2005, Robin Birch wrote: In message , Fred writes Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? I've always thought of it as a change in the lift drag vector. If your glider is flying in still air the lift drag vector is pointing up and towards the tail. If rising air is entered, which effectively increases the lift vector the new lift/drag vector points slightly more forward than previously. This reduces the effective drag and the glider accelerates until everything balances out again. This may be total rubbish but it is the model I've found easiest to visualise. Robin -- Robin Birch |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Edmond Dantes wrote: Fred, The thermal is giving you "free lift". Since the wing now doesn't produce as much lift, induced drag is simultaneously reduced. With reduced drag, airspeed increases. Hope this helps, Brad There is no such thing as "free lift". The wing/tailplane produces lift -- all of it. If you feel a push upwards, it is the wing doing it. As you enter the updraft you get an increased angle of atack, increased lift, increased drag, and upwards acceleration. As noted by others, if you leave the stick in the same place then the speed will increase due to stability making the glider pitch down, but thsi will only be a very temporary effect and will dissappear soon after the glider's vertical speed has equalized with the updraft -- which is only a matter of a second or two. Consider that it's pretty common to feel a half-G surge on entering a strong thermal, that a G is 10 m/s per second, and that strong thermals are 4 - 7 m/s, and and it's clear that the glider gains the upwards velocity of the thermal pretty quickly. -- Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+- Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An odd clearance...can anyone explain? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 32 | September 18th 04 09:35 PM |
TEC, can anyone use small words and explain this to me? | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | November 16th 03 05:51 PM |
Please explain | T3 | Military Aviation | 28 | November 14th 03 11:11 PM |
Can anyone explain what TFR's are supposed to do? | Corky Scott | Piloting | 33 | October 23rd 03 12:42 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |