![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tiger" wrote in message ... Russian Aircraft Carrier On Its Way to North Atlantic By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, MOSCOW The Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov left the port of Murmansk on March 23 to carry out military exercises in the north Atlantic, Russian news reports said. For two weeks, the Admiral Kuznetsov will implement a series of military exercises involving the airplanes on board, ITAR-TASS quoted the Russian Navy chief-of-command as saying. More than 40 takeoffs are scheduled to take place during the exercises. Counting bolters, bingos and senior officer RONs, arrested landing will likely be less than half that (if things go as planned). Ahhh, give me the good old days when you could see 40 cat shots long before being relieved for lunch. Come to think of it, by Summer's early light, I've seen that many before being relieved (early) for the Forenoon. Not many Centurions in Russian NAVAIR..... TMO |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() TOliver wrote: "Tiger" wrote in message ... Russian Aircraft Carrier On Its Way to North Atlantic By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, MOSCOW The Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov left the port of Murmansk on March 23 to carry out military exercises in the north Atlantic, Russian news reports said. For two weeks, the Admiral Kuznetsov will implement a series of military exercises involving the airplanes on board, ITAR-TASS quoted the Russian Navy chief-of-command as saying. More than 40 takeoffs are scheduled to take place during the exercises. Counting bolters, bingos and senior officer RONs, arrested landing will likely be less than half that (if things go as planned). Ahhh, give me the good old days when you could see 40 cat shots long before being relieved for lunch. Come to think of it, by Summer's early light, I've seen that many before being relieved (early) for the Forenoon. Not many Centurions in Russian NAVAIR..... TMO Nor will there ever be - as the Admiral Kuznetsov does not 'do' cat shots. It has a ski ramp - the resident Su-33's wind up to full power and are held back by retractable 'fingers' in front of the mainwheels. When these retract, the a/c accelerates up over the ramp. The Kuznetsov has four arresting wires - and is therfore a 'STOBAR' design. They did look into - and even built - a working catapult, but rejected it in favour of the ski jump. Ken See my pages at http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/...ges/su-27k.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Duffey wrote:
:The Kuznetsov has four arresting wires - and is therfore a 'STOBAR' design. You're going to have to explain where the back half of that acronym comes from. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Take Off But Arrested Recovery
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/STOBAR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STOBAR http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/stobar Ken Fred J. McCall wrote: Ken Duffey wrote: :The Kuznetsov has four arresting wires - and is therfore a 'STOBAR' design. You're going to have to explain where the back half of that acronym comes from. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Duffey wrote:
Short Take Off But Arrested Recovery http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/STOBAR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STOBAR http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/stobar Ken Fred J. McCall wrote: Ken Duffey wrote: :The Kuznetsov has four arresting wires - and is therfore a 'STOBAR' design. You're going to have to explain where the back half of that acronym comes from. Whereas US, French and Brazilian CV/CVNs are described as CATOBAR, and everything else (at the moment) is STOVL. Guy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guy Alcala" a écrit dans le message news: ... Ken Duffey wrote: (snip) Whereas US, French and Brazilian CV/CVNs are described as CATOBAR, and everything else (at the moment) is STOVL. Guy CTOL for conventional take-off and landing seems more appropriate. Why does one want a B in CATOBAR ? is there any catapult take-off and vertical landing ? Christophe |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christophe Chazot wrote:
"Guy Alcala" a écrit dans le message news: ... Ken Duffey wrote: (snip) Whereas US, French and Brazilian CV/CVNs are described as CATOBAR, and everything else (at the moment) is STOVL. Guy CTOL for conventional take-off and landing seems more appropriate. Why does one want a B in CATOBAR ? is there any catapult take-off and vertical landing ? Christophe CTOL, STOL, VTOL, VSTOL all refer to land-based ops. Carrier launches are anything but 'conventional' - hence the CATO bit. I guess you have to add BAR to differentiate it from a VL - as in a Harrier. That would be STOVL ?? So, for carrier ops you can CATO or STO to launch and BAR or VL to recover - and mix-and-match to suit .... CATOBAR, STOBAR, STOVL - but no CATOVL (AFAIK) ?? I agree about the B bit - why would you want to add 'But' ?? - you don't say 'Short Take Off BUT Vertical Landing' - STOBVL do you ?? Ken |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christophe Chazot" wrote in message ... "Guy Alcala" a écrit dans le message news: ... Ken Duffey wrote: (snip) Whereas US, French and Brazilian CV/CVNs are described as CATOBAR, and everything else (at the moment) is STOVL. Guy CTOL for conventional take-off and landing seems more appropriate. Why does one want a B in CATOBAR ? is there any catapult take-off and vertical landing ? Guessing here, did it once stand for Barrier Assisted Recovery (i.e. a net). But as the barriers became out of favor, the acronym was reworked? Was the CATOBAR phrase used during WWI or WWII? Or is it a more modern acronym? John Gilbert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Alcala wrote:
:Whereas US, French and Brazilian CV/CVNs are described as CATOBAR, and everything :else (at the moment) is STOVL. And why isn't that STOAVL, given that we're now including words like 'but' in the acronyms? -- "It's always different. It's always complex. But at some point, somebody has to draw the line. And that somebody is always me.... I am the law." -- Buffy, The Vampire Slayer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Duffey wrote:
:Short Take Off But Arrested Recovery And when did we start including conjunctions and such in acronyms? Why isn't VSTOL rendered as VOSTOAL? -- "It's always different. It's always complex. But at some point, somebody has to draw the line. And that somebody is always me.... I am the law." -- Buffy, The Vampire Slayer |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Next Generation Aircraft Carrier Contract Awarded | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 6 | May 23rd 04 02:53 PM |
32 Russian Soldiers Killed and Wounded In Chechnya | Michael Wise | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 06:15 PM |
Russian Air Force Woes - Time to start again? | Peter Kemp | Military Aviation | 31 | February 21st 04 02:10 AM |
Requested report of Russian losses in Chechenia | B2431 | Military Aviation | 4 | February 5th 04 09:50 PM |
RUSSIAN WAR PLANES IN ASIA | James | Military Aviation | 2 | October 1st 03 11:25 PM |