A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Iowa City Airport in the News



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 7th 05, 02:47 AM
John E. Carty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"john smith" wrote in message
...
John Galban wrote:
Good job Jay! I'm not a fan of Wal-Mart, but they will be a much
better airport neighbor than a housing development (a problem we have
at my airport). The fact that Wal-Mart also has the $$'s to allow the
airport to bail itself out is also handy.


And, they will be frequent user of the airport.


How do you figure Wal-Mart will be a frequent user of the airport???


  #2  
Old April 7th 05, 06:28 AM
H.P.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How do you figure Wal-Mart will be a frequent user of the airport???

For starters, Wal-Mart's HQ and regional/area/zone executives, buyers,
managers and suppliers, and others who have legitimate business with
Wal-Mart will be flying in.

PLUS union organizers, democrats, lame stream media, food police, PETA,
Serial ADA Plaintiffs, Al Sharpton and the other unwashed members of "The
National Junta of Ersatz Victims of Wal-Mart Who Have No Other Job Than To
Complain With Envy About The Company's Success-" ...and the mother of Jesse
Jackson's illegitimate child... will be using the airport as well. Sounds
like a new airport hotel may be needed. Jay?








"John E. Carty" wrote in message
...

"john smith" wrote in message
...
John Galban wrote:
Good job Jay! I'm not a fan of Wal-Mart, but they will be a much
better airport neighbor than a housing development (a problem we have
at my airport). The fact that Wal-Mart also has the $$'s to allow the
airport to bail itself out is also handy.


And, they will be frequent user of the airport.


How do you figure Wal-Mart will be a frequent user of the airport???



  #3  
Old April 7th 05, 04:22 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PLUS union organizers, democrats, lame stream media, food police, PETA,
Serial ADA Plaintiffs, Al Sharpton and the other unwashed members of "The
National Junta of Ersatz Victims of Wal-Mart Who Have No Other Job Than To
Complain With Envy About The Company's Success-" ...and the mother of
Jesse
Jackson's illegitimate child... will be using the airport as well.
Sounds
like a new airport hotel may be needed. Jay?


It's been a long, wild ride with Wal-Mart, and our Airport Commerce Park.
Hang on -- this is a crazy story:

For years our airport has been starved of funds. The city couldn't close
it, but they sure as hell weren't going to support it, either. So, taxiways
deteriorated, runways weren't extended, basic maintenance was cut to the
bone.

The independent Airport Commission -- made up of all volunteers -- decided
the best way around this conundrum was to become self-sufficient. But how?

When the FAA announced in the early '90s that they could no longer support a
third runway at the airport (Rwy 18/36, which is due to be closed next
year), the commission realized its closure could open up some financial
opportunities. So they began looking at the land on the northern edge of
the airport, and realized that they could carve out 50 acres or so, and
create an industrial park, with the intention of leasing the land to
businesses and light industry. This would provide enough income to support
the airport, and in one bold stroke, we would go from being a "welfare
recipient" to total self-sufficiency. They convinced the city of the
perfection of this plan, and -- seeing dollar signs -- the city agreed to
develop the infrastructure, at a cost of many millions of dollars.

Sadly, the volunteer commission -- clearly NOT real-estate moguls -- made a
basic, but HUGE, mistake in their initial calculations. Here's what
happened:

They had figured the size of the property, divided it into sections, figured
out what they would have to get for each plot in order to pay back the
infrastructure loans and generate income, and then divided it into a
"per-square-foot" lease amount. Easy enough.

However, when they sat down with the first potential tenants, the realtor
pointed out all the utility (and other) easements that the commission was
including in their per-square-foot computations! Incredibly, no one in the
city had caught this basic error, and all sorts of finger-pointing ensued.
Finally, after this major oops was acknowledged, they had to pull out many
thousands of square feet from the land they were trying to lease -- which
left their potential income BELOW what it would cost to pay back the
infrastructure loans!

Thus, their only option was to increase the "per-square-foot" lease amount
to allow for the same amount of potential income. Only problem was, this
rate was much higher than any other available land in the area -- so (of
course) no one wanted it. Thus, the terrific idea had become a huge
millstone around the city's (and commission's) neck. Virtually the entire
airport commission ended up resigning in frustration, and acrimony between
the city and airport grew.

That's how thing have sat for five years. Now, with a new and more
politically connected airport commission, relations have improved. And
now, with Wal-Mart stepping up to buy (not lease) the first 21 acre chunk,
the airport is at last on its way to self-sufficiency. (Although many
obstacles remain. They *sold* this land to Wal-Mart, meaning that it's a
one-time shot of money. There is a huge, on-going battle over whether
future sales should be allowed, or whether it should be all leases...)

But the battle isn't over yet. The anti Wal-Mart faction is trying to get
organized -- despite the fact that Wal-Mart has been in Iowa City since the
1980s. In fact, the NEW Wal-Mart is going to be built directly adjacent to
the OLD Wal-Mart -- but, for some reason this gang of disgruntled university
egg-heads is getting all riled up about it anyway. (They are being led by
the same guy who tried -- and failed -- to stop the first Wal-Mart from
coming to Iowa City in the '80s!)

I personally despise Wal-Mart -- shoot, they STILL owe me money from my last
business -- but that's beside the point. They are the most successful
retailer in the world because PEOPLE LOVE TO SHOP THERE. I wish this fact
was pointed out to the anti-Wal-Mart activists on-camera once in a while,
since it would highlight the fact that they are quite blatantly saying that
all Wal-Mart shoppers are too stupid to make their own decisions. But
that's another post...

Bottom line: Our airport could FINALLY be on the path to financial
security, and it will ultimately be ringed by retail (rather than
industrial) interests. This can only be a good thing!
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"
"H.P." wrote in message
om...
How do you figure Wal-Mart will be a frequent user of the airport???


For starters, Wal-Mart's HQ and regional/area/zone executives, buyers,
managers and suppliers, and others who have legitimate business with
Wal-Mart will be flying in.









"John E. Carty" wrote in message
...

"john smith" wrote in message
...
John Galban wrote:
Good job Jay! I'm not a fan of Wal-Mart, but they will be a much
better airport neighbor than a housing development (a problem we have
at my airport). The fact that Wal-Mart also has the $$'s to allow the
airport to bail itself out is also handy.

And, they will be frequent user of the airport.


How do you figure Wal-Mart will be a frequent user of the airport???





  #4  
Old April 7th 05, 09:27 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jay Honeck" wrote

Bottom line: Our airport could FINALLY be on the path to financial
security, and it will ultimately be ringed by retail (rather than
industrial) interests. This can only be a good thing!
--
Jay Honeck


And what the heck! Another bonus is that WalMart roofs make a pretty good
small plane emergency landing place! (WINK-GRIN)
--
Jim in NC

  #5  
Old April 7th 05, 10:25 PM
airman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Now, if only we can convince Wal-Mart to sell AvGas or open a Pilot Shop.
Should have been part of the sales contract.


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Jay Honeck" wrote

Bottom line: Our airport could FINALLY be on the path to financial
security, and it will ultimately be ringed by retail (rather than
industrial) interests. This can only be a good thing!
--
Jay Honeck


And what the heck! Another bonus is that WalMart roofs make a pretty good
small plane emergency landing place! (WINK-GRIN)
--
Jim in NC



  #6  
Old April 7th 05, 10:34 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"airman" wrote

Now, if only we can convince Wal-Mart to sell AvGas or open a Pilot Shop.
Should have been part of the sales contract.


Yea, and a place you can get your oil changed, and your tires rotated! :-)
--
Jim in NC
  #7  
Old April 7th 05, 11:45 PM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"airman" wrote

Now, if only we can convince Wal-Mart to sell AvGas or open a Pilot

Shop.
Should have been part of the sales contract.


Yea, and a place you can get your oil changed, and your tires rotated!

:-)
--
Jim in NC


No way in hell would a minimum wage (or lower) Wal-Mart employee touch
something that my life depended on.


  #8  
Old April 7th 05, 10:43 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And what the heck! Another bonus is that WalMart roofs make a pretty good
small plane emergency landing place! (WINK-GRIN)


I suspect they wouldn't hold up, but does anybody know for sure?

Jose
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #9  
Old April 7th 05, 11:49 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And what the heck! Another bonus is that WalMart roofs make a pretty
good
small plane emergency landing place! (WINK-GRIN)


I suspect they wouldn't hold up, but does anybody know for sure?

Jose


I have seen pictures of small planes landing on retail store roofs (or was
it a factory?) before. Not much damage, as long as you don't hit one of
those big AC units! A some factories have big skylights, too. I suspect
that dropping a nosewheel would suck, too!
--
Jim in NC

  #10  
Old April 8th 05, 01:43 AM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:
And what the heck! Another bonus is that WalMart roofs make a pretty
good
small plane emergency landing place! (WINK-GRIN)



I suspect they wouldn't hold up, but does anybody know for sure?


Roofs in this area of NJ are designed for a snow load of around 30 pounds per
square foot. I expect they're stronger in Iowa, but they're still not designed
to hold a typical small plane.

George Patterson
Whosoever bloweth not his own horn, the same shall remain unblown.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 15th 03 10:01 PM
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 15th 03 10:01 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 November 30th 03 05:57 PM
Suggestions and/or help, please! Jay Honeck Piloting 30 July 26th 03 03:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.