![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:57:17 -0400, "Gary Drescher"
wrote: "Peter R." wrote in message ... My interpretation of his post was that flying for AF is not really a humanitarian act because we as their pilots *merely* do it as an excuse to fly and nothing else. Nope, not 'merely'. Just *largely*. The same amount of effort--and especially money--directed elsewhere could do far more good. None of which is to criticize Angel Flight, though; I continue to volunteer for them, and encourage others to do the same. I disagree. Given the time and money outlayed, I don't understand what additional 'good' could be done for these patients AF flights enable the treatment that gives them a chance to live. Example: I have flown AF cancer patients to/from Mayo (3 hr flight). This would have been a 10 hr drive, or a close to 10 hr flight with connections. Many of the patients are close to bankrupcy because of their medical conditions. How else would you propose I redirect ~6hrs of time and ~$400 of finances to help them? -Nathan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nathan Young" wrote in message
... I disagree. Given the time and money outlayed, I don't understand what additional 'good' could be done for these patients AF flights enable the treatment that gives them a chance to live. Example: I have flown AF cancer patients to/from Mayo (3 hr flight). This would have been a 10 hr drive, or a close to 10 hr flight with connections. Many of the patients are close to bankrupcy because of their medical conditions. How else would you propose I redirect ~6hrs of time and ~$400 of finances to help them? It's not that the same resources could necessarily be put to better use for the *same beneficiaries* (although if they're close to bankruptcy, they might actually benefit more if we stayed at home and just donated to them what the cost of the flight would have been--including all expenses, plus the value of our time). Rather, my point is that for the cost of a single Angel Flight, we could e.g. buy antibiotics for children who would otherwise die of easily preventable diseases, saving many lives. Again, Angel Flights do accomplish a great deal of good, and it's not necessarily unreasonable for us to act from a combination of altruistic and selfish motivations. I just want to maintain a realistic perspective about what that combination is. --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed | What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe | Military Aviation | 3 | August 21st 04 12:40 AM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |