![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott D. wrote in message ... On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:15:41 -0400, "Peter R." Well, Jefco (BJC) is probably the nicest towered airport with more services. I never pay for the fuel there so I don't know what their prices are, but they will have plenty of hanger space. I have never been to 18V and I have only been to 48V twice to pickup props from Rocky Mountain Propellers located on the field. http://www.airnav.com/fuel/local.html $2.85 at 48V $3.48 at BJC $2.60 (Mar. 11) at 2V2 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:50:19 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
wrote: Yup, missed the "or" at the end of the line. Well, excuuuuuseeee me!! :~) Figured that was what happened. I too will speed read through something and miss a key word. Scott D To email remove spamcatcher |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:55:52 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
wrote: Scott D. wrote in message .. . On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:15:41 -0400, "Peter R." Well, Jefco (BJC) is probably the nicest towered airport with more services. I never pay for the fuel there so I don't know what their prices are, but they will have plenty of hanger space. I have never been to 18V and I have only been to 48V twice to pickup props from Rocky Mountain Propellers located on the field. http://www.airnav.com/fuel/local.html $2.85 at 48V $3.48 at BJC $2.60 (Mar. 11) at 2V2 Ouch, guess I know now why I never fuel there. Besides, it is only a 20 min flight from COS where I am based out of so there is no reason to get fuel there. I go in there from time to time to pick up someone but that's about it. Scott D To email remove spamcatcher |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
My plan is to fly the majority of it under IFR flight rules and at altitudes in the mid-to-upper teens (westerly wind-depending). Excuse me for asking but... If you intend to fly at those altitudes why would you be concerned about mountain flying? I mean, are there going to be any lee side rotors that high? Mountain waves are not really a factor, are they? Density altitude, temp/dewpoint spread, short field landings, soft field landings, valley winds, etc. are not really a factor at that altitude. About the only things that might be a factor would be icing (unlikely at that altitude because temp is too cold) or a thunderstorm, which is of concern for every flight. I have always considered mountain flying to be flying *in* the mountains and the things that concern a mountain pilot to be at or below the peaks. Is this incorrect? Thanks, Antonio |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Toņo" wrote I have always considered mountain flying to be flying *in* the mountains and the things that concern a mountain pilot to be at or below the peaks. Is this incorrect? Yes. The waves extend way up past the peaks, and so do rotors. -- Jim in NC |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Toņo wrote:
Peter R. wrote: My plan is to fly the majority of it under IFR flight rules and at altitudes in the mid-to-upper teens (westerly wind-depending). Excuse me for asking but... If you intend to fly at those altitudes why would you be concerned about mountain flying? I mean, are there going to be any lee side rotors that high? Mountain waves are not really a factor, are they? Density altitude, temp/dewpoint spread, short field landings, soft field landings, valley winds, etc. are not really a factor at that altitude. And what happens if the engine conks out? Where do you land? How do you land? And reading the Imeson book is NOT sufficient. About the only things that might be a factor would be icing (unlikely at that altitude because temp is too cold) or a thunderstorm, which is of concern for every flight. And when that happens, all of a sudden you need to worry about mountain waves, density altitude, valley winds, etc. Calculate glide distance from 16K and tell me where & how you're going to land. I have always considered mountain flying to be flying *in* the mountains and the things that concern a mountain pilot to be at or below the peaks. Is this incorrect? yes. But back to the original poster. You have the right idea. Take the ABQ (or AEG)-TAFOY-TAD-anyplace north. Watch out for the MOAs they're usually hot. You'll have a great view of Pikes Peak on your left. Then, if you have time and are interested, take a mountain flying lesson and you'll go on the west side of PP and fly into Leadville. And lean. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tango Whiskey wrote:
Somebody here posted recently what I think is great advice. Night, Mountains, Single Engine: pick any two. Well, I picked only one: Single Engine. ![]() I flight planned away from the mountains (where possible) and we are going to leave early AM. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott D. wrote:
Easiest way to define them is to find the La Veta MOA. You can also draw a line from Alamosa Co, to Pueblo, to 1V6 (Fremont County) back to Alamosa and they are the mountains in that triangle. Got it. Thanks. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tony roberts wrote:
If the left side of a narrow valley (with an out at the end) has a downdraft, and the right side has an updraft would you fly left, right or middle? And why? If you can't answer that without even thinking about it, a couple of hours of mountain training would be a good investment. I may look up an instructor when I am there. Thanks. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
TSA rule 49 CFR Part 1552 (or its misinterpretation) is already preventing people from flying (even renters) (long) | Bay Aviator | Piloting | 15 | October 21st 04 10:29 PM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |