![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Toņo" wrote Not according to Sparky Imeson.... "...the rotor cloud will be downwind from the mountain range and extend anywhere from the earth's surface to up to mountain-top level". --p.63 of "Mountain Flying" by Sparky Imeson Antonio There is some disagreement with this, and here is a clip: Normally the rotor clouds is centered beneath the lenticular cloud. Most often it extends anywhere from ground level to mountaintop level, but is frequently observed up to 35,000 feet. Destructive turbulence from the rotor rarely exists more than 2,000-3,000 feet above mountaintop level. Well? Your last sentence says it..."Destructive turbulence from the rotor rarely exists more than 2,000-3,000 feet above mountaintop level." I see no "disagreement" about it. My point is, just because you clear the ridge, there are still dangers that can ruin your day,snip I agree and never stated otherwise. However, the OP was wondering whether he should take a "mountain flying" course in order to make a cross-country trip at altitudes of 16-19,000 ft. My contention was that this was not *mountain flying* per se and that he was wasting his time thinking that a mountain flying course would in any way prepare him for the trip. The topic is not "are there dangers at high altitudes" as some here seem to be trying to make it; it is: "would one benefit by a mountain flying course if one were flying at high altitudes?" At least, that's how I read it. Thanks for the great link! Antonio |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
TSA rule 49 CFR Part 1552 (or its misinterpretation) is already preventing people from flying (even renters) (long) | Bay Aviator | Piloting | 15 | October 21st 04 10:29 PM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |