![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Kyle Boatright" wrote: "John S" wrote in message hlink.net... How does one decide whether to paint an airplane with laquer, enamel, polyurethane, or two-part epoxy? I've read all the Ron Alexander articles about painting in Sport Aviation, and I still don't know. (It's an aluminum floatplane.) Thanks to all those with strong opinions and the will to express them. John Let's see.. Laquer is easy to spray, but is brittle. Even the smallest rocks will chip the paint. Laquer will also fail faster if there is any oil canning. This is probably the least expensive paint system. I used a catalyzed enamel on my RV. There are several good choices out there. Some are single stage paints and some are two stage (i.e. you clear coat them). The two stage paints tend to add a little weight due to the extra coat of material. Enamels (particularly the catalyzed ones) hold up well to chemical and phyisical abuse. This is a mid-priced paint system. These products have top notch gloss and color retention. These products are somewhat flexible, and will hold up to oil canning and flexing much better than laquer. Polyurethanes have the best gloss and color retention, and are more chemically resistant than the other products. Polyurethanes are very flexible, and are the least likely to crack when used on surfaces that flex or oil can. They are the most expensive solution. All of these are generalizations, and are subject to proper mixing and application of the paint type. Also, there are high and low quality brands of each of these types of paint. Earl Scheib ain't spraying the same poly paint that goes on at the Porsche factory... Here's a link that I googled up. It might give you a better idea of the difference between catalyzed enamel and poly paints. Personally, I think those are the only two alternatives that make sense today. On fabric, I prefer dope, as it is easy to work and easy to touch up. On metal, I prefer either polyurethane or catalyzed acrylic, as they are far more durable than enamel or lacquer. I would not use lacquer on metal, as it has far inferior chip and crack resistance and durability. You CAN touch up orethane and catalyzed acrylic -- it takes some effort, but both CAN be sanded and rubbed to look like hand-rubbed lacquer -- all it takes is elbow grease. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opinions wanted on UK integrated CPL(H) courses | Simon Robbins | Rotorcraft | 5 | October 18th 04 06:02 PM |
| paint shop recommendations wanted (SE) | Stephen N Mills | Owning | 0 | January 29th 04 04:44 PM |
| Opinions Wanted - Arrow, Archer, 182, 177RG, Early 210's | Larryskydives | Owning | 28 | January 25th 04 06:51 AM |
| Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 05:15 AM |
| Opinions wanted: Accelerated Flight Training Center of Arizona | Ross Oliver | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | December 31st 03 07:23 PM |