![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:2mqce.34479$r53.15777@attbi_s21... To truly privatize it would require free market competition among providers of ATC services. That simply is not possible. They used to say that the phone company or the utility companies needed to be monopolies. Exactly. Economic sectors where only monopoly businesses can function pretty much defines (in my mind) where "government" should exist. Such as? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... They used to say that the phone company or the utility companies needed to be monopolies. That's not quite the same situation. True competition between phone and utility companies would require each company to create their own distribution networks in the same area. Separate phone, gas, and electrical lines for each company. It could be done but at greater cost to the consumer and less profit for the company. You could have separate ATC providers, each providing their own infrastructure in the form of radar sites, radio transceivers, etc., but their clients would all be operating in the same airspace. Customers of Acme ATC would be separated from other Acme ATC customers, and Consolidated ATC clients would be separated from each other, but Acme ATC customers could not be separated from Consolidated ATC clients. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Barrow" writes:
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:2mqce.34479$r53.15777@attbi_s21... To truly privatize it would require free market competition among providers of ATC services. That simply is not possible. They used to say that the phone company or the utility companies needed to be monopolies. And, in fact, there is only *one* gas pipe, *one* water pipe, *one* sewer pipe running down the street out front of my house. And only *one* set of electrical wires in the neighborhood. And *one* set of phone wires. And *one* set of cable company coax. It's possible to multiplex services from different companies on them, to some extent. It's not very meaningful for the water, phone, electricity, or sewer; for the phone wires, also used for DSL, it actually seems to work well to allow multiple ISPs to connect through those lines. But tht's because it's a separate run from the switching office to each house, whereas all the rest use shared wiring/piping. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
User Fees | Dude | Owning | 36 | March 19th 05 05:57 PM |
NAA Fees to the US Team | Doug Jacobs | Soaring | 2 | October 29th 04 01:09 AM |
LXE installation XP, strict user permissions. | Hannes | Soaring | 0 | March 21st 04 11:15 PM |
The Irony of Boeing/Jeppesen Being Charged User Fees! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | January 23rd 04 12:23 PM |
Angel Flight pilots: Ever have an FBO refuse to wave landing fees? | Peter R. | Piloting | 11 | August 2nd 03 01:20 AM |