![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gig Giacona" wrote:
Read this today on AVWEB. What is the deal? http://avweb.com/newswire/11_19b/briefs/189753-1.html Gig and all, No action is required under this notice for the vast majority of pilots who fly experimental aircraft. This notice affects only those pilots who wish to carry passengers in an experimental aircraft for which they do not hold the appropriate category and class rating. No action is required under this notice, for example, for pilots who hold a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and fly a SEL experimental aircraft. On the other hand, pilots who hold a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and fly a multi-engine experimental aircraft (MEL) will need to comply with the new requirements if they wish to carry passengers in their multi-engine experimental aircraft. Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document) http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David O wrote:
"Gig Giacona" wrote: Read this today on AVWEB. What is the deal? http://avweb.com/newswire/11_19b/briefs/189753-1.html Gig and all, No action is required under this notice for the vast majority of David Thanks for the info. It also answers my post elsewhere on this ng. John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to "David O" for the link to the FAA Notice as a Word Document.
The way that I read it, this new procedure is really intended by the FAA to be a convenient shortcut for those pilots holding a Recreational certificate or higher, and who desire priveleges to fly only a particular make and model of aircraft for which they would not otherwise be qualified. The example is given of the Leza Air Cam, which a pilot with a multi-engine land rating is qualified to fly. A pilot holding only a single engine land rating could qualify, in as few as five hours, to carry passengers in the Air Cam; but would not be automatically qualified to fly any other multi-engine aircraft. Additional discussion, and additional example(s) make this a very good thing to read--expecially since the EAA explanation, which I read first, left me with an entirely different impression... Peter Disclaimer: I am not curently a pilot, nor have I ever been an attorney. Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document) http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 14 May 2005 20:58:40 -0400, "Peter Dohm"
wrote: Thanks to "David O" for the link to the FAA Notice as a Word Document. The way that I read it, this new procedure is really intended by the FAA to be a convenient shortcut for those pilots holding a Recreational certificate or higher, and who desire priveleges to fly only a particular make and model of aircraft for which they would not otherwise be qualified. The example is given of the Leza Air Cam, which a pilot with a multi-engine land rating is qualified to fly. A pilot holding only a single engine land rating could qualify, in as few as five hours, to carry passengers in the Air Cam; but would not be automatically qualified to fly any other multi-engine aircraft. Additional discussion, and additional example(s) make this a very good thing to read--expecially since the EAA explanation, which I read first, left me with an entirely different impression... Peter Disclaimer: I am not curently a pilot, nor have I ever been an attorney. Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document) http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com I just want to point out that this really isn't "New". My airworthiness certificate issued in 2002 says the same thing. The only thing that is new about it is that it sounds like they are going to make it easier for you if you can show experience in the past year (I believe it was since Aug) and don't want to jump through all the hoops of say a multi-engine rating then you can get the experimental multi-engine. It also sounds like they may be planning on enforcing it now too. Gary |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David O" wrote in message ... "Gig Giacona" wrote: Read this today on AVWEB. What is the deal? http://avweb.com/newswire/11_19b/briefs/189753-1.html Gig and all, No action is required under this notice for the vast majority of pilots who fly experimental aircraft. This notice affects only those pilots who wish to carry passengers in an experimental aircraft for which they do not hold the appropriate category and class rating. No action is required under this notice, for example, for pilots who hold a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and fly a SEL experimental aircraft. On the other hand, pilots who hold a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and fly a multi-engine experimental aircraft (MEL) will need to comply with the new requirements if they wish to carry passengers in their multi-engine experimental aircraft. Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document) http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html Thanks David, The you and the EAA did a much better job explaining it than AVWeb did. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, and I think AVWeb got really gigged on this. In their latest
newsletter they get it right, basically what's been said here on this newsgroup. Neal Gig Giacona wrote: "David O" wrote in message ... "Gig Giacona" wrote: Read this today on AVWEB. What is the deal? http://avweb.com/newswire/11_19b/briefs/189753-1.html Gig and all, No action is required under this notice for the vast majority of pilots who fly experimental aircraft. This notice affects only those pilots who wish to carry passengers in an experimental aircraft for which they do not hold the appropriate category and class rating. No action is required under this notice, for example, for pilots who hold a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and fly a SEL experimental aircraft. On the other hand, pilots who hold a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and fly a multi-engine experimental aircraft (MEL) will need to comply with the new requirements if they wish to carry passengers in their multi-engine experimental aircraft. Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document) http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html Thanks David, The you and the EAA did a much better job explaining it than AVWeb did. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reading back altimeter settings? | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 31 | April 12th 05 04:53 PM |
FAA Mandatory Pilot Retirement Rule Challenged | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | March 20th 05 08:56 PM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
Proposed new flightseeing rule | C J Campbell | Home Built | 56 | November 10th 03 05:40 PM |
Hei polish moron also britain is going to breach eu deficit 3% rule | AIA | Military Aviation | 0 | October 24th 03 11:06 PM |