A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Currency Rule for Homebuilt?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 14th 05, 11:03 PM
David O
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gig Giacona" wrote:


Read this today on AVWEB. What is the deal?
http://avweb.com/newswire/11_19b/briefs/189753-1.html



Gig and all,

No action is required under this notice for the vast majority of
pilots who fly experimental aircraft. This notice affects only those
pilots who wish to carry passengers in an experimental aircraft for
which they do not hold the appropriate category and class rating. No
action is required under this notice, for example, for pilots who hold
a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and
fly a SEL experimental aircraft. On the other hand, pilots who hold a
private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and
fly a multi-engine experimental aircraft (MEL) will need to comply
with the new requirements if they wish to carry passengers in their
multi-engine experimental aircraft.

Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document)
http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc

Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice
http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html


David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com


  #2  
Old May 14th 05, 11:42 PM
UltraJohn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David O wrote:

"Gig Giacona" wrote:


Read this today on AVWEB. What is the deal?
http://avweb.com/newswire/11_19b/briefs/189753-1.html



Gig and all,

No action is required under this notice for the vast majority of



David
Thanks for the info. It also answers my post elsewhere on this ng.
John

  #3  
Old May 15th 05, 01:58 AM
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks to "David O" for the link to the FAA Notice as a Word Document.

The way that I read it, this new procedure is really intended by the FAA to
be a convenient shortcut for those pilots holding a Recreational certificate
or higher, and who desire priveleges to fly only a particular make and model
of aircraft for which they would not otherwise be qualified.

The example is given of the Leza Air Cam, which a pilot with a multi-engine
land rating is qualified to fly. A pilot holding only a single engine land
rating
could qualify, in as few as five hours, to carry passengers in the Air Cam;
but would not be automatically qualified to fly any other multi-engine
aircraft.

Additional discussion, and additional example(s) make this a very good
thing to read--expecially since the EAA explanation, which I read first,
left me with an entirely different impression...

Peter

Disclaimer: I am not curently a pilot, nor have I ever been an attorney.


Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document)
http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc

Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice
http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html


David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com




  #4  
Old May 16th 05, 10:33 AM
Sully
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 14 May 2005 20:58:40 -0400, "Peter Dohm"
wrote:

Thanks to "David O" for the link to the FAA Notice as a Word Document.

The way that I read it, this new procedure is really intended by the FAA to
be a convenient shortcut for those pilots holding a Recreational certificate
or higher, and who desire priveleges to fly only a particular make and model
of aircraft for which they would not otherwise be qualified.

The example is given of the Leza Air Cam, which a pilot with a multi-engine
land rating is qualified to fly. A pilot holding only a single engine land
rating
could qualify, in as few as five hours, to carry passengers in the Air Cam;
but would not be automatically qualified to fly any other multi-engine
aircraft.

Additional discussion, and additional example(s) make this a very good
thing to read--expecially since the EAA explanation, which I read first,
left me with an entirely different impression...

Peter

Disclaimer: I am not curently a pilot, nor have I ever been an attorney.


Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document)
http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc

Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice
http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html


David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com




I just want to point out that this really isn't "New". My
airworthiness certificate issued in 2002 says the same thing. The
only thing that is new about it is that it sounds like they are going
to make it easier for you if you can show experience in the past year
(I believe it was since Aug) and don't want to jump through all the
hoops of say a multi-engine rating then you can get the experimental
multi-engine. It also sounds like they may be planning on enforcing
it now too.

Gary
  #5  
Old May 15th 05, 08:59 PM
Gig Giacona
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David O" wrote in message
...
"Gig Giacona" wrote:


Read this today on AVWEB. What is the deal?
http://avweb.com/newswire/11_19b/briefs/189753-1.html



Gig and all,

No action is required under this notice for the vast majority of
pilots who fly experimental aircraft. This notice affects only those
pilots who wish to carry passengers in an experimental aircraft for
which they do not hold the appropriate category and class rating. No
action is required under this notice, for example, for pilots who hold
a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and
fly a SEL experimental aircraft. On the other hand, pilots who hold a
private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate and
fly a multi-engine experimental aircraft (MEL) will need to comply
with the new requirements if they wish to carry passengers in their
multi-engine experimental aircraft.

Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document)
http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc

Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice
http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html


Thanks David,

The you and the EAA did a much better job explaining it than AVWeb did.


  #6  
Old May 18th 05, 02:23 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah, and I think AVWeb got really gigged on this. In their latest
newsletter they get it right, basically what's been said here on this
newsgroup.

Neal


Gig Giacona wrote:
"David O" wrote in message
...
"Gig Giacona" wrote:


Read this today on AVWEB. What is the deal?
http://avweb.com/newswire/11_19b/briefs/189753-1.html



Gig and all,

No action is required under this notice for the vast majority of
pilots who fly experimental aircraft. This notice affects only

those
pilots who wish to carry passengers in an experimental aircraft for
which they do not hold the appropriate category and class rating.

No
action is required under this notice, for example, for pilots who

hold
a private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate

and
fly a SEL experimental aircraft. On the other hand, pilots who

hold a
private pilot SEL airplane category and class rating certificate

and
fly a multi-engine experimental aircraft (MEL) will need to comply
with the new requirements if they wish to carry passengers in their
multi-engine experimental aircraft.

Here is a link to the FAA notice (a MS Word document)
http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/notices/8700/n8700-42.doc

Here is a link to the EAA's explanation of the notice
http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...09_rating.html


Thanks David,

The you and the EAA did a much better job explaining it than AVWeb

did.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reading back altimeter settings? Paul Tomblin Piloting 31 April 12th 05 04:53 PM
FAA Mandatory Pilot Retirement Rule Challenged Larry Dighera Piloting 0 March 20th 05 08:56 PM
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. Larry Dighera Piloting 0 February 22nd 04 03:58 PM
Proposed new flightseeing rule C J Campbell Home Built 56 November 10th 03 05:40 PM
Hei polish moron also britain is going to breach eu deficit 3% rule AIA Military Aviation 0 October 24th 03 11:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.