|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
May 20th 05, 11:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Butler wrote:
jsmith wrote: Got a mailing from the FAA this week requesting comments on a proposed, new, non-fed control tower to be built at OSH. Airspace Case No.: 05-AGL-8-NR The proposed new tower is to be 146 feet AGL/948 feet MSL to be located at these coordinates: N 43-58-54.05, W 88-33-47.28. (Anyone have a topo that can tell us where on the field that will be?) Deadline for comments is 27 June 2005. http://www.naco.faa.gov/content/naco...ms/00730AD.PDF By eyeball, that's pretty close to where the existing tower is. DGB It was my understanding that it's going to be about two blocks farther west than where the current tower is (and taller) 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
| Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
| Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA | PlanetJ | Instrument Flight Rules | 168 | December 6th 03 01:51 PM |
| Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA | PlanetJ | Piloting | 167 | December 6th 03 01:51 PM |
| Preferred Routing or Tower Enroute Control | cefarthing | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | November 30th 03 04:53 PM |
Hybrid Mode
