A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

DCA to reopen to GA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 25th 05, 05:08 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WASHINGTON - Private planes will be allowed to take off and land at Reagan

Great news!
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #2  
Old May 25th 05, 05:18 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WASHINGTON - Private planes will be allowed to take off and land at Reagan

Great news!


Uh, not so fast. 45 a day (ok, that's a start), security clearances
first (which probably includes fingerprinting like a common criminal - I
understand that other airports in the area already do this), and an
armed officer being on board the aircraft. Presumably this is an
appropriately vetted officer. Where are they going to get these
officers? Land at Gaithersberg first? Have them flown out to the
originating airport?

This sounds like just enough to open the airport to corporate jets,
which is just enough to shut enough people up so that it stops there.
Maybe I'm just too cynical from living in the Northeast, and I hope it
goes well and leads to our government granting us more privileges in our
nation's captiol, but I'm not holding my breath.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #3  
Old May 25th 05, 09:41 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



first (which probably includes fingerprinting like a common criminal - I
understand that other airports in the area already do this),

Jose


Not only common criminals are fingerprinted.

I have been fingerprinted voluntarily numerous times.. A few times for
the purpose of obtaining and renewing my state's concealed handgun
license (which by the way, is NOT banned in small planes.. only the
airliners..).

Dave

  #4  
Old May 25th 05, 07:47 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:

...., and an
armed officer being on board the aircraft. Presumably this is an
appropriately vetted officer. Where are they going to get these
officers?


Well, if your State has such a thing, apply for an honorary deputy sheriff's
position and take the required training.

George Patterson
"Naked" means you ain't got no clothes on; "nekkid" means you ain't got
no clothes on - and are up to somethin'.
  #5  
Old May 25th 05, 12:52 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't see how it's such "Great News". With a requirement to have a
law enforcement officer on board, it does nothing for those of us with
small planes. I have to have a cop sitting in my Skyhawk to land
there? Where do I get one? Where do I put him if I have my wife and
baggage with me?

It's just more silly, unnecessary bull****.

  #7  
Old May 25th 05, 01:21 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rosspilot wrote:

Where do I put him if I have my wife and baggage with me?


On the wing.

--
Peter

  #8  
Old May 25th 05, 03:55 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't see how it's such "Great News". With a requirement to have a
law enforcement officer on board, it does nothing for those of us with
small planes.


It's a step in the right direction, plain and simple.

Nothing more, nothing less.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #9  
Old May 25th 05, 06:34 PM
Guy Elden Jr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, I disagree. It is as someone else mentioned, just enough of a step
to shut up the people who actually matter to the gov't. The rest of us,
unfortunately, only get heard through AOPA, and they obviously don't
have enough clout to get us our rightful access to the DC-3 airports...
honestly, I could care less about flying into DCA... the other airports
that have been shutdown are far more GA friendly. At least there is a
way to get in to them, but it requires jumping through way too many
hoops for the occasional transient pilot.

--
jr

  #10  
Old May 25th 05, 07:27 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guy Elden Jr wrote:
No, I disagree. It is as someone else mentioned, just enough of a step
to shut up the people who actually matter to the gov't. The rest of us,
unfortunately, only get heard through AOPA, and they obviously don't
have enough clout to get us our rightful access to the DC-3 airports...


Anybody can get access to the DC-3 airports. You just have to go
through the vetting process. That was opened up a few months ago.
Of course, the process is annoying to get vetted and mildly annoying
(on a busy day when both the Leesburg FSS and Potomac approach have
long call queues0.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CGS, others reopen David Lesher General Aviation 0 February 11th 05 04:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.