![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe Delphi" wrote:
Just because the Navy issued a press release in March doesn't mean that the advance planning and material removal had not been going on for some time before that. Since America was non-nuclear, that takes care of one of the large environmental problems right there. Totally understand that. It's very clear that some planning had been going on before the announcement. but generally ships used like this are in many ways cleaner than when they were built. Wonder if they have to do an EIR - Environmental Impact Report, for this type of thing? That's what I was wondering. Usually, like the old joke, when there's enough paperwork to weigh down the ship, it sinks. Maybe as someone suggested, a ship sunk this deep does not require the same effort as one sunk closer to shore. I don't know, it seems to have gone through awfully quickly for an operation of this size. Scott Peterson -- Rome did not create a great empire by having meetings...they did it by killing all those who opposed them. 417/612 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE..... | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 19 | October 24th 03 07:51 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |