![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Guys:
I am in the process buying a malibu and I was just told the engine log is missing (overhauled in 1996, currently 850 hours smoh)but the owner has MOST of the invoices for the work done during last nine years since the overhaul. My questions are the following; 1. How much is the discounted value on this airplane without the engine log? 2. Can a replacement log book be generated with these invoices? if so, would it be just a record or a log book that is as good as the orginal? 3. To what extent will the reconstructed log book to be considered a good one. For example: If the seller has the original invoice for the overhaul work performed with total time recorded and if a paid receipt for every annual inspection as attached. will this be acceptable? Thank you in advance for any input. Jack |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Hello Guys: I am in the process buying a malibu and I was just told the engine log is missing (overhauled in 1996, currently 850 hours smoh)but the owner has MOST of the invoices for the work done during last nine years since the overhaul. My questions are the following; 1. How much is the discounted value on this airplane without the engine log? 2. Can a replacement log book be generated with these invoices? if so, would it be just a record or a log book that is as good as the orginal? No, and it's doubtful that the invoice has even close to the level of detail the logs had. 3. To what extent will the reconstructed log book to be considered a good one. Not much. For example: If the seller has the original invoice for the overhaul work performed with total time recorded and if a paid receipt for every annual inspection as attached. will this be acceptable? It may be legal, but again, think of how much detail is on an invoice. Thank you in advance for any input. Be VERY careful and discount the information DEEPLY. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this really true? You can certify the time on the engine simply by
using the shop records from last annual and adding the time since. You will probably have to have any ADs resigned, but other than that, I can't think why you can't recreate the log book. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
Is this really true? Is what really true? George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The engine is worth it's core value only - the log book is what makes
an engine CERTIFIED... Call TCM and ask them what it will cost to get the engine certified again - and hold on to your wallet... denny |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going to disagree with Denny and say it's not nearly that bad. The
engine is certified if it has the appropriate data plate (seemingly without regard to what is attached to the data plate G). However, if indeed there are NO logs, then at this precise moment the engine (and hence the aircraft) are not airworthy. Basically all you are going to need to make it airworthy is a sheet of paper from the AI that did the last annual, with the annual engine signoff. That done, and without evidence of anything to the contrary, you are legal to fly. [And don't say that because there is no log book that you don't know if anything was done since annual to make it unairworthy. Those are independent events, and the logbook is only one slight way you might discover such a change.] Now... the money items: Without proper logbook documentation, it is harder to sell the plane. Not a big problem if you plan to keep the plane a long time (by which time you will have probably gone through an overhaul anyway), but still an issue. Second, you have no record of exactly what is installed in the engine. The last annual AI will be attesting to all the AD's performed as of that time, but you have no formal record that they were properly carried out. Future AI *could* (and very likely might) insist that some work be done to verify the AD's before signing off on the next annual. And you might find yourself doing extensive work (splitting the case) just to find that your engine didn't even fall under some AD in the future. Can you make a NEW logbook? Sure, done all the time. You start by trying to get copies of the last overhaul records, plus whatever the manufacturer might still have on that specific serial number. Ditto the accessories. Then take all the receipts, invoices, etc. And you make up what you can. Perfectly legal... but doesn't really solve all the problems above. Me? I would start with the negotiating position that the engine is due for overhaul and reduce the price as if the engine was at TBO. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As others have pointed out (and I won't belabor their points) this is not
true. Jim "Denny" wrote in message ups.com... The engine is worth it's core value only - the log book is what makes an engine CERTIFIED... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, simple enough to find out for sure... He can call the FSDO and
ask them if he makes up a logbook is the engine airworthy... Be interesting for him to report back to us... I'm always willing to learn... denny |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Denny wrote: Well, simple enough to find out for sure... He can call the FSDO and ask them if he makes up a logbook is the engine airworthy... Be interesting for him to report back to us... I'm always willing to learn... There's really no requirement to have a logbook for the engine at all. There are record keeping requirements, but they don't specify you have to have everything in some type of book. That said, to be airworthy, all of the ADs on the engine have to be signed off somewhere. While reciepts with hours and details of work might be informative, unless they are properly signed off (unlikely), that doesn't satisfy the requirements. I would think that you'd have to get the proper signoffs before the engine was airworthy. This might be a simple as having the original signer recreate the entries in a new logbook, or as difficult as having all applicable ADs performed again. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Denny" writes:
Well, simple enough to find out for sure... He can call the FSDO and ask them if he makes up a logbook is the engine airworthy... Be interesting for him to report back to us... I'm always willing to learn... Why do you think "the logbook" is needed? Can you point out where the FARs speak of "logbook"? What are the FAR stated requirements for this "logbook"? How long must one keep this "logbook"? -jav |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Missing engine | Marty Schmidt | Piloting | 3 | October 27th 04 09:03 PM |
Engines and Reliability | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 13 | June 30th 04 03:27 PM |
My Engine Fire!! | [email protected] | Piloting | 21 | April 2nd 04 05:02 PM |
Engine... Overhaul? / Replace? advice please | text news | Owning | 11 | February 17th 04 04:44 PM |
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |