![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I came in even later - what a thread! I have nothing of value to add
but would comment: - That'll teach you to come in to this forum half-cocked and full of hearsay(laugh here) - All this asymmetrical thrust talk, besides getting the 6.5 hour MEL rated pilot a bit hot, just makes 'ol Bob Hoover's Shrike routine glow brighter in the gathering dusk. Capt.Doug wrote: Coming into this thread a little late cause I've been busy.... The aircraft that crashed was a Merlin 3A (not to be confused with the long-body Metroliner series). Vmc is 107 knots. Best 2-engine approach speed is 111knots (which is still too fast and floats a lot of runway). Vyse is 144 knots. The leading edge radius of the airfoil is small (sharper stall characteristics which require a stick pusher). The vertical stabilizer is small (in relation to the over-all design). Reverse thrust if highly effective and full reverse thrust is prohibited above 40 knots because assymetric reverse thrust will overpower the nose wheel steering. These airplanes have yaw dampers and some have an additional thing called rudder bias, but they are getting a bit old and some operators don't fix these things. Having over 5000 hours in the Merlin/ Metro series, I can say that single-engine landings are not nearly as easy as in a piston trainer twin. They have earned their various nicknames (Lawn Dart, Death Tube, San Antonio Sewer Pipe...). The KingAir 200 is the same size but is much easier to handle during single-engine landings because the KingAir has a larger rudder and vertical stabilizer, more wing dihedral, larger airfoil leading edge radius, and lower stall speed, and less effective reverse thrust. These reasons are also why the Merlin runs 20 knots faster and 500 miles farther on 15% less fuel. I fly non-stop from Los Angeles to Daytona Beach regularly. The performance and economy are wonderful. Someone who passes their multi-engine practical can likely land a KingAir with one engine out. Not so with the Merlin 3. During normal 2-engine approaches, if I inadvertently have 20% torque on one engine but only 10% torque on the other, I will have to use significant rudder to maintain directional control. Add an additional failure mode such as the propeller going to flat pitch and even an experienced pilot will have a difficult time. D. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:20 AM |
How much could I get for these back issues? | Aaron Smith | Home Built | 8 | December 15th 03 12:07 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 Control Issues | SouthBayGuy | Simulators | 22 | November 26th 03 04:31 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |