![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 Jul 2005 06:46:09 -0700, "M.E. Borner" wrote:
I use a pennies per hour rate. There is a Governement website (http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/con...asic.jsp&P=MTT) that has a per mile rate ($1.07) for reimbursement for privately owned aircraft. I convert that into $/hr. based on the performance of my aircraft. I feel that this is a pretty solid figure since it is published by the governement and appears on the same page as the accepted $ .305 per mile for cars. Though it does not really tract actual expenses incurred. For example, if you had a single and a twin both with the same cruise performance they would come out to the same reimbursement number but we all know the running expenses of the twin would actually be higher. Well, don't forget that the page you reference has nothing to do with the IRS. It is merely what the GSA chooses to give its employees. There's no guarantee that the IRS will accept those numbers, although they might. OTOH, there is a history of the IRS accepting actual expenses (including depreciation). When I was using my Mooney for business purposes, I would always come out ahead using actual costs rather than whatever the GSA was allowing its employees in any particular year. Looking at last years numbers, I would still come out ahead using actual numbers vs the GSA employee reimbursement rate. It's likely the Sundowner is less expensive to maintain than my Mooney, but if the OP has recently purchased it, he may have a significant depreciation deduction that he is giving up. In addition, if he has a major a/c related expense, he might be able to benefit significantly from the actual cost method. An engine or new avionics can be depreciated; a paint job can (or at least could in the past) be written off entirely in the year it was done. There also may (or may not) be issues with whether or not he is above or below 50% business use threshold; and I seem to recall that once you choose to use the standard mileage rate (for autos), that you have to stick with it. Probably his best bet would be to not fear the record keeping requirements, and also to check with folk knowledgeable about writing off a/c usage. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |