A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Who is EAA? (was Oshkosh gate...)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 5th 05, 05:19 PM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Interesting Points Jim!
I think you have hit the nail on the head for the reason alot of folks
are getting turned off by the EAA. I know when I pick up a mag about
Experimentals I want to see how-to's .....not the buy this 40G kit and paint
by numbers. But a tradesman sharing his knowledge for people willing to
learn . I want to read about Homebuilt aircraft and not the latest gadget
from Cirrus.
As for the warbirds, I think maybe they do have a place because of the
lack of available parts. But shouldn't the main topic of the warbirds be"How
we had to fab our own replacement parts?" , instead of the WOW just look at
the pretty old fighter? I don't mind restoration projects, because Lord
knows sometimes as much goes into them as building a plane. Alot of times
building a plane is exactly what you are doing!
But sometimes when I have read the EAA mags it seems there is more about
piloting then building. I think real homebuilders get just as much enjoyment
out of the building process as they do the flying. The flying is the reward
for the fun of labor and effort in building.
I know liability and all that would not let it happen , but wouldn't it
be great if the EAA mags would have articles about building a homebuilt with
the plans as well, like the old MI mags used to do? That would be
HOMEBUILDING!!

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech

  #2  
Old July 5th 05, 08:57 PM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"W P Dixon" wrote in message ...
Interesting Points Jim!
I think you have hit the nail on the head for the reason alot of folks are getting turned off by the EAA. I know
when I pick up a mag about Experimentals I want to see how-to's .....not the buy this 40G kit and paint by numbers.
But a tradesman sharing his knowledge for people willing to learn . I want to read about Homebuilt aircraft and not
the latest gadget from Cirrus.


Are you a tradesman willing to write an article? Finding folks with the knowledge is tough; finding ones willing to
write alo is tougher!

As for the warbirds, I think maybe they do have a place because of the lack of available parts. But shouldn't the
main topic of the warbirds be"How we had to fab our own replacement parts?" , instead of the WOW just look at the
pretty old fighter? I don't mind restoration projects, because Lord knows sometimes as much goes into them as building
a plane. Alot of times building a plane is exactly what you are doing!


I don't recall the last time I saw an article in Sport Aviation about a specific warbird, let alone about a restoration
of one. There have been a number of articles about exhibition class experimantal aircraft; bought and paid for by the
owner with very little detail about the actual buid - as you say the WOW factor...

But sometimes when I have read the EAA mags it seems there is more about piloting then building. I think real
homebuilders get just as much enjoyment out of the building process as they do the flying. The flying is the reward
for the fun of labor and effort in building.


There are quite a few articles these days about welding, structural design, electrical connections. Not a whole lot of
meat to them tho'. I think a multi issue build along sort of articlee would be good...

I know liability and all that would not let it happen , but wouldn't it be great if the EAA mags would have
articles about building a homebuilt with the plans as well, like the old MI mags used to do? That would be
HOMEBUILDING!!

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech


Interesting comment about the liability issue. I suppose they to try not to be too specific because some will most
likely try and come along and say "That's what Sport Aviation said to do!"

Dan D...


  #3  
Old July 5th 05, 09:18 PM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey Dan,
Well I am not much of a writer, but I am willing to help anyone who asks
for it as far as my skill as a metalsmith. I think to be able to write for
the mag , one should be able to write better than myself. But if asked I
would probably give it a try.
And yep the whole liability thing BLOWS! It would really be nice to have
a homebuilt airplane covered from the plans thru the building process.
Drawings right there in the mag!!! Wouldn't that get a new person interested
if he saw all that in an issue?
To tell the truth I do not recall the last article I read of a warplane
either, because I wouldn't read it My warplane remarks pertained mostly
to the warplanes at EAA events and such,...just the WOW factor! I'd much
rather see how they actually did the restoration in a mag ..especially if it
takes the alloted space of a Cessna story or some such. And heck, I love
seeing the old warbirds myself! But like Jim I have to think where it all
fits in to Experimental and Homebuilt aircraft.

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech

"Blueskies" wrote in message
. ..

"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
Interesting Points Jim!
I think you have hit the nail on the head for the reason alot of folks
are getting turned off by the EAA. I know when I pick up a mag about
Experimentals I want to see how-to's .....not the buy this 40G kit and
paint by numbers. But a tradesman sharing his knowledge for people
willing to learn . I want to read about Homebuilt aircraft and not the
latest gadget from Cirrus.


Are you a tradesman willing to write an article? Finding folks with the
knowledge is tough; finding ones willing to write alo is tougher!

As for the warbirds, I think maybe they do have a place because of the
lack of available parts. But shouldn't the main topic of the warbirds
be"How we had to fab our own replacement parts?" , instead of the WOW
just look at the pretty old fighter? I don't mind restoration projects,
because Lord knows sometimes as much goes into them as building a plane.
Alot of times building a plane is exactly what you are doing!


I don't recall the last time I saw an article in Sport Aviation about a
specific warbird, let alone about a restoration of one. There have been a
number of articles about exhibition class experimantal aircraft; bought
and paid for by the owner with very little detail about the actual buid -
as you say the WOW factor...

But sometimes when I have read the EAA mags it seems there is more
about piloting then building. I think real homebuilders get just as much
enjoyment out of the building process as they do the flying. The flying
is the reward for the fun of labor and effort in building.


There are quite a few articles these days about welding, structural
design, electrical connections. Not a whole lot of meat to them tho'. I
think a multi issue build along sort of articlee would be good...

I know liability and all that would not let it happen , but wouldn't
it be great if the EAA mags would have articles about building a
homebuilt with the plans as well, like the old MI mags used to do? That
would be HOMEBUILDING!!

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech


Interesting comment about the liability issue. I suppose they to try not
to be too specific because some will most likely try and come along and
say "That's what Sport Aviation said to do!"

Dan D...


  #4  
Old July 6th 05, 12:37 AM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

("W P Dixon" wrote)
[snip]
Well I am not much of a writer, but I am willing to help anyone who asks
for it as far as my skill as a metalsmith. I think to be able to write for
the mag , one should be able to write better than myself. But if asked I
would probably give it a try.



You know what you want to say (you have the experience) ...find someone who
will help you say it. Find yourself a good editor.

With e-mail and Word Perfect, it's a snap.

Mom edits scholarly Catholic books, reference books, encyclopedias, etc. She
says she enjoys working with the professors, scholars, and other (sometimes)
brilliant researchers. Problem with many of them is - they can't write.
Punctuation? Fuhgetaboutit.

Many would-be editors cut their teeth working on small hometown newspapers,
church newsletters, etc. You should be able to find yourself a good editor
with little effort. (They love working at home ...on the side ...per page)

Good luck, let us know when you're published :-)


Montblack

  #5  
Old July 6th 05, 01:21 AM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Seems like that would make the editor the writer ,huh ?

Patrick
student SPL
aircraft structural mech


"Montblack" wrote in message
...

Mom edits scholarly Catholic books, reference books, encyclopedias, etc.
She
says she enjoys working with the professors, scholars, and other
(sometimes)
brilliant researchers. Problem with many of them is - they can't write.
Punctuation? Fuhgetaboutit.

Many would-be editors cut their teeth working on small hometown
newspapers,
church newsletters, etc. You should be able to find yourself a good editor
with little effort. (They love working at home ...on the side ...per page)

Good luck, let us know when you're published :-)


Montblack


  #6  
Old July 6th 05, 04:03 AM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, the writer is the one that comes up with the ideas and expresses them in
a manner that is somewhat understandable. The editor puts them into a form
that is consistent with style, grammar, and punctuation.

Both are absolutely necessary to the process; if you can find both of them
in one individual, you've got a rare bird indeed.

Jim


"W P Dixon" wrote in message
...
Seems like that would make the editor the writer ,huh ?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oshkosh gate admission on Sunday 24th? Montblack Home Built 83 July 7th 05 11:56 PM
Oshkosh gate admission on Sunday 24th? Montblack Owning 28 July 3rd 05 04:32 AM
Oshkosh gate admission on Sunday 24th? Montblack Piloting 28 July 3rd 05 04:32 AM
NS Norfolk Gate 2 NATOPS - All Hands Memorize Immediately! Yofuri Naval Aviation 0 December 17th 04 05:38 AM
How I got to Oshkosh (long) Doug Owning 2 August 18th 03 12:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.