![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:02:20 -0400, "Peter R."
wrote: "Peter R." wrote: Assuming we're talking about KUDD, 73' elevation, 40 deg C temp, altimeter 29.79, I come up with pressure altitude of 190' and density alt of 3050. Hmmm, I keep arriving at a DA about 1200 feet higher. Cross checking this with several DA calculator websites confirms about 4,200 ft or so. Nevermind, I see the discrepancy. The OP was asking about 120 degrees F, which is about 49 degrees C. That was the temp I was using. Yea, my bad. They only print the chart to 40 so that number got stuck in my head. 49C comes out with 4k density alt. So extrapolating from the 40C column at 4K comes out with 1770/3085 for roll/50' obst. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yea, my bad. They only print the chart to 40 so that number got stuck
in my head. 49C comes out with 4k density alt. So extrapolating from the 40C column at 4K comes out with 1770/3085 for roll/50' obst. You don't need to account for density altitude in this case since the POH is already giving the performance numbers at the non-standard temperature. By using the numbers for 40C and 4000ft you're essentially double counting the effect of higher temperature and far underestimating the performance. Since the chart only goes to 40C you still have to extrapolate to the higher temperature and you have to make a guess about the pressure altitude but in the end the distance to clear a 50' obstacle should still be under 2000 ft. - Ray |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:48:27 -0700, "Ray" wrote:
Yea, my bad. They only print the chart to 40 so that number got stuck in my head. 49C comes out with 4k density alt. So extrapolating from the 40C column at 4K comes out with 1770/3085 for roll/50' obst. You don't need to account for density altitude in this case since the POH is already giving the performance numbers at the non-standard temperature. By using the numbers for 40C and 4000ft you're essentially double counting the effect of higher temperature and far underestimating the performance. Since the chart only goes to 40C you still have to extrapolate to the higher temperature and you have to make a guess about the pressure altitude but in the end the distance to clear a 50' obstacle should still be under 2000 ft. Yea, I was thinking that since the chart lists pressure altitude on the left column, but figured I'd throw out the number for the 4K pressure 50C extrapolation and let the original poster do decide what to do with the data. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ray" wrote in message
... [...] Since the chart only goes to 40C you still have to extrapolate to the higher temperature Or, they can use the density altitude, but pick performance figures for standard temp from the POH. No extrapolation necessary in that case. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Ford V-6 engine work | Corky Scott | Home Built | 19 | August 21st 03 12:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |