![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"three-eight-hotel" wrote in message
oups.com... I am currently IFR and have been giving some consideration into going after the commercial rating. You're IFR and you're posting? Shouldn't you be paying attention to the instruments, and wait until you're back on the ground for Usenet? [...] My bottom-line question is... How much is this going to cost me and can I really afford it? I don't know whether you can afford it. I can't even tell you how much it will cost, though obviously you can calculate a minimum cost based on how much airplanes and instructors cost in your area. The actual cost, likely to be at least somewhat above the theoretical minimum, will depend on you, your instructor, and sometimes circumstances beyond either of your control. Aside from the 10 hours of complex time (plus the checkride in a complex airplane) and the instructor costs for those 10 hours, it seems like most of the requirements may have already been covered in the instrument training or can be done on your own. For example: The 300 NM XCtry, 5 hr. night-VFR with 10 to's and lndgs. at a towered airport, ... It is true, for many pilots, their every day flying covers much of the basic aeronautical experience requirements for the Commercial Pilot certificate. FAR 61.129 has the details you need to know. I know there are some new maneuvers, but those can be learned in the 172 and confirmed in the complex plane as part of the 10 hours. Can they? It really depends on the pilot and the instructor. In my own case, I certainly spent more time learning the maneuvers than I expected to. Things went more smoothly after I had some time off (medical problems) and came back to a new instructor. It just seems to me that most of the requirements may have been met during previous training and/or by getting out and flying? Yes, that may well be the case for you. Is it reasonable to think that I might be able to: * Spend 4 or 5 hours in the 172, learning all the new maneuvers for the checkride (at the cost of fuel and an instructor) I would be surprised if you could learn all of the maneuvers in just 5 hours. There are five tasks in the PTS that are likely brand-new for the typical Private Pilot, and several more that probably will require at least some time revisiting to brush up on. It's theoretically possible that you could learn each of the new maneuvers in 1 hour each, but it seems unlikely. For what it's worth, I used a 172 to learn the maneuvers, but frankly I found the complex airplane I intended to use for the checkride -- the Cardinal RG -- to be much easier to fly. I wouldn't call either the 172 or the 177RG "precise" airplanes, but the Cardinal certainly had better "feel" to it, IMHO. Your mileage may vary, of course. * Spend 10 hours in a complex plane (at the cost of the plane and instructor), learning the plane and dialing in the maneuvers * Take the checkride (cost of DE and plane) If I flew a 2 hr. day XCtry and 2 hr. night XCtry, meeting the NM requirements, with an instructor while working on the instrument rating, would that carry-over? At a minimum, you would have to meet the VFR requirement as well. Reading the Part 61 FAQ, Q&A 93 says that an instrument training flight done under simulated instrument conditions does NOT qualify for the 2 hour XC requirements, even if the VFR conditions requirement is met (apparently because, even though the actual conditions are VFR, the pilot is still flying under IMC...the fact that it's simulated IMC is irrelevant). In another question, the FAQ does clarify that you can do simulated instrument conditions in a given flight, and still count that flight for the 2 hours XC. But only if there are 2 hours NOT spent under simulated instrument conditions for that flight. For example, if you had a 2.5 hour training flight, meeting the distance requirements, during which you used a view limiting device for less than half an hour (perhaps you only flew the approaches under simulated instrument conditions), and for which the rest of the flight was done under VFR conditions, that would be fine. Is the requirement that a logbook entry exist for those elements, or that they were done while training for the commercial rating? You would certainly need a logbook entry for any aeronautical experience you intend to use for the certificate. There is not, as far as I know, a requirement that the training be done specifically for the Commercial Pilot certificate. The training flight does, of course, need to include aspects of piloting found in 61.127(b)(1), but there's nothing that says that training has to happen after you have "officially" commenced on your Commercial Pilot training. My ultimate goal is to get the CFI ticket, and let other help support my habit! ;-) Then it's an investment. The real question would be, can you afford to NOT get the Commercial Pilot certificate. Assuming you eventually make the cost of the training back through your paid piloting duties, no amount for the training would be too much, and once you've paid off the training, everything else is gravy. Right? ![]() Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Power Commercial to Glider Commercial | Mitty | Soaring | 24 | March 15th 05 03:41 PM |
Someone wanting to use our plane for thier commercial multi ticket | Scott D. | Owning | 16 | November 16th 04 03:38 AM |
NEW & UNOPENED: Gleim Commercial Pilot Knowledge Test (book AND Commercial Pilot Test Software) | Cecil Chapman | Products | 2 | November 13th 04 03:56 AM |
Do You Want to Become a Commercial Helicopter Pilot? | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 7 | August 22nd 04 12:00 AM |
What to study for commercial written exam? | Dave | Piloting | 0 | August 9th 04 03:56 PM |