A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RUN!! Forrest!! RUN!!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 30th 05, 04:00 PM
John Larson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And why would that make sense? It costs $1,000,000,000 to launch the garbage
scow (yes, the secondary mission of the shuttle, after the failed test
flight re. the parts falling off this model T, and the delivery of supplies
that could have been done by the Russians with their unmanned vehicle) was
to retrieve the 13 odd tons of garbage the useless space station has been
collecting.

It is so annoying to read the posts by you Buck Rogers wannabe's on this
board. You are all so enthralled by the space program you can't see just how
pointless and useless it is.

Yes, we have been whining about this boondoggle, the shuttle, and the ISS
for years. And with good reason.
"Mike W." wrote in message
...

"John Larson" None ... wrote in message
...
I am glad he got away. 40 mile no fly zone. Idiotic.


OK, he abandoned the plane he was flying. Someone will want that plane
back.
They will find out who was flying it. He escaped, for now.

A 40 mile no-fly zone around the shuttle launch site makes a hell of a lot
more sense than the presidential TFR's that go up every time he wants to
fly
somewhere to kiss ass.




  #2  
Old August 2nd 05, 04:28 AM
Mike Weller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:00:37 -0700, "John Larson" None ... wrote:

And why would that make sense? It costs $1,000,000,000 to launch the garbage
scow (yes, the secondary mission of the shuttle, after the failed test
flight re. the parts falling off this model T, and the delivery of supplies
that could have been done by the Russians with their unmanned vehicle) was
to retrieve the 13 odd tons of garbage the useless space station has been
collecting.

It is so annoying to read the posts by you Buck Rogers wannabe's on this
board. You are all so enthralled by the space program you can't see just how
pointless and useless it is.


Don't you have the least inkling to want to fly to the other planets?

We have to start with basic physics.

Sadly, though, there are no new avenues to that other than pure brain
power, which is NASA's best attribute.

Mike Weller


  #3  
Old August 2nd 05, 06:10 AM
John Larson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Never liked to read science fiction, and never wanted to fly to other
planets. Have all the fun I can find flying this one.

I just think there are better uses for our tax dollars than shooting humans
into space for fun.


"Mike Weller" wrote in message
news:1122949349.642e06b1d94d9aef3b083b7f79065faa@o nlynews...
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:00:37 -0700, "John Larson" None ... wrote:

And why would that make sense? It costs $1,000,000,000 to launch the
garbage
scow (yes, the secondary mission of the shuttle, after the failed test
flight re. the parts falling off this model T, and the delivery of
supplies
that could have been done by the Russians with their unmanned vehicle) was
to retrieve the 13 odd tons of garbage the useless space station has been
collecting.

It is so annoying to read the posts by you Buck Rogers wannabe's on this
board. You are all so enthralled by the space program you can't see just
how
pointless and useless it is.


Don't you have the least inkling to want to fly to the other planets?

We have to start with basic physics.

Sadly, though, there are no new avenues to that other than pure brain
power, which is NASA's best attribute.

Mike Weller




  #4  
Old August 7th 05, 02:17 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:28:54 -0500, Mike Weller
wrote in
1122949349.642e06b1d94d9aef3b083b7f79065faa@onlyn ews::

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:00:37 -0700, "John Larson" None ... wrote:

It is so annoying to read the posts by you Buck Rogers wannabe's on this
board. You are all so enthralled by the space program you can't see just how
pointless and useless it is.


Don't you have the least inkling to want to fly to the other planets?


The paltry amount of funding for the US space program, a constructive
endeavor, in comparison to the tens of billions of dollars squandered
annually on useless war, a destructive action, is moot testament to
our nation's reprehensible lack of foresight and the ravenous appetite
of those currently in power for plundering the coffers of the US
Treasury. So while the space shuttle program has become a somewhat
regular and repetitious assertion of man's noble intent to continue to
explore the frontiers of his environment in search of the riches he
may find there, the state of war entreats emergency funding, and at
times extra-constitutional power, that provides an opportunity for
increasing the wealth of those in power and oppressing the populous.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fightertown at Mt. View, Lake Forrest, Pasadena, Ca. Motion Simulators Rich Simulators 3 November 6th 04 08:52 PM
Rebuilding my KR-2(kind of S) Forrest Home Built 3 January 4th 04 10:03 PM
Jon Johanson stranded in Antartica.... John Ammeter Home Built 149 December 24th 03 04:42 PM
Rebuilding my KR-2 Forrest Home Built 2 December 13th 03 08:59 AM
Rebuilding my KR-2 Forrest Home Built 10 December 9th 03 04:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.