![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of seriously cool customers. The instructor talks about abandoning
the aircraft with about as much emotion as I use when I'm ordering a burger and fries. I only hope I'm that calm and collected when I meet my first in-flight emergency. My hat's off to these guys. Shawn "Dave in Columbus" wrote in message ... On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:56:34 -0700, "Matt Barrow" wrote: http://www.fazed.org/video/view/?id=40 Interesting! Hey Ernie I visit your site quite regularly, but I've never written in till now. The jet in question is a CT-155 Hawk. It is a jet trainer built by British Aerospace Systems and flown by the Canadian Air Force.(CT-155 is the Canadian designation. The British designation is BAE 115 Hawk, or something like that.) The accident happened about 2 years ago in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, where a lot of the pilot training for the Canadian Air Force is done. I just completed pilot training there myself, although I didn't fly the Hawk. Anyway, as you can see, they had a bird strike shortly after take-off. They were doing about 230 knots, and at 200 feet when they sucked in the bird. The one and only engine flamed out almost immediately. There was a student and instructor in the airplane at the time. The instructor immediately took control and attempted to turn around in order to carry out a forced landing. However, they didn't have enough altitude and decided to eject. They were at about 800 feet, 150 knots when the ejected. Both pilots survived. The student had virtually no injuries. The instructor severely injured his spine and broke his leg. The student returned to flying almost immediately. I am unsure if the instructor is back flying, but as of about 7 or 8 months ago, he was not. Here is a link to a site with several pictures of the Hawk, as well as more info. I'd be happy to answer anymore questions you may have. Cheers, Mike G. Pilot, Canadian Air Force (Courtesy of http://www.ehowa.com/home.shtml) -- Dave in Columbus |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ShawnD2112 wrote:
A couple of seriously cool customers. The instructor talks about abandoning the aircraft with about as much emotion as I use when I'm ordering a burger and fries. ....and he keeps giving good instruction in the process (i.e., "Fly the airplane") --Sylvain |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ya know...
.....this video made wonder: Is it common practice to eject from planes which have ejection seats instead of ditching? I was surprised they chose to eject and lose the plane instead of make an off-airport landing in a clearing. Ejecting has risks of its own. It's a violent event which can result in injury (which evidently happened). Perhaps jets like that are considered too dangerous to ditch due to their high landing speeds. Then again, a Hawk lands about the same speed as a Citation. Humm... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ShawnD2112 wrote:
A couple of seriously cool customers. The instructor talks about abandoning the aircraft with about as much emotion as I use when I'm ordering a burger and fries. I only hope I'm that calm and collected when I meet my first in-flight emergency. My hat's off to these guys. I was thinking the same thing. I guess that is one advantage of now owning the airplane you are flying! :-) Matt |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frankie wrote:
Ya know... ....this video made wonder: Is it common practice to eject from planes which have ejection seats instead of ditching? I was surprised they chose to eject and lose the plane instead of make an off-airport landing in a clearing. Ejecting has risks of its own. It's a violent event which can result in injury (which evidently happened). Perhaps jets like that are considered too dangerous to ditch due to their high landing speeds. Then again, a Hawk lands about the same speed as a Citation. Yes, you don't want to land a jet full of fuel at 130 knots or more on rough terrain. That is what the seats are for. Matt |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.fazed.org/video/ scroll down to the video in question (F-15 bird into engine) There are aural cockpit warnings: "T6 NL" and "We are not done" What do they mean? Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
There are aural cockpit warnings: "T6 NL" and "We are not done" What do they mean? I thought the second one actually was 'gear not down', wasn't it? --Sylvain |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
http://www.fazed.org/video/ scroll down to the video in question (F-15 bird into engine) There are aural cockpit warnings: "T6 NL" and "We are not done" What do they mean? Jose There's a thread about this video on the Pprune military forum at : http://www.pprune.com/forums/showthr...hreadid=184747 The 'more info' link in the second post talks about the T6NL. I agree that the other warning sounds like "gear not down". |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mooney Engine Problems in Flight | Paul Smedshammer | Piloting | 45 | December 18th 04 09:40 AM |
My Engine Fire!! | [email protected] | Piloting | 21 | April 2nd 04 05:02 PM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |
fatal bird strike | StellaStar | Piloting | 9 | July 13th 03 09:41 PM |