A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Video: Bird sucked into F-15 engine at takeoff



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 9th 05, 07:13 AM
ShawnD2112
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A couple of seriously cool customers. The instructor talks about abandoning
the aircraft with about as much emotion as I use when I'm ordering a burger
and fries. I only hope I'm that calm and collected when I meet my first
in-flight emergency. My hat's off to these guys.

Shawn

"Dave in Columbus" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:56:34 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
wrote:

http://www.fazed.org/video/view/?id=40

Interesting!

Hey Ernie

I visit your site quite regularly, but I've never written in till now. The
jet in question is a CT-155 Hawk. It is a jet trainer built by British
Aerospace Systems and flown by the Canadian Air Force.(CT-155 is the
Canadian designation. The British designation is BAE 115 Hawk, or
something
like that.) The accident happened about 2 years ago in Moose Jaw,
Saskatchewan, where a lot of the pilot training for the Canadian Air Force
is done. I just completed pilot training there myself, although I didn't
fly the Hawk.

Anyway, as you can see, they had a bird strike shortly after take-off.
They
were doing about 230 knots, and at 200 feet when they sucked in the bird.
The one and only engine flamed out almost immediately. There was a student
and instructor in the airplane at the time. The instructor immediately
took
control and attempted to turn around in order to carry out a forced
landing. However, they didn't have enough altitude and decided to eject.
They were at about 800 feet, 150 knots when the ejected. Both pilots
survived. The student had virtually no injuries. The instructor severely
injured his spine and broke his leg. The student returned to flying almost
immediately. I am unsure if the instructor is back flying, but as of about
7 or 8 months ago, he was not.

Here is a link to a site with several pictures of the Hawk, as well as
more
info. I'd be happy to answer anymore questions you may have.

Cheers,
Mike G.
Pilot, Canadian Air Force


(Courtesy of http://www.ehowa.com/home.shtml)
--

Dave in Columbus



  #12  
Old August 9th 05, 07:24 AM
Sylvain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ShawnD2112 wrote:
A couple of seriously cool customers. The instructor talks about abandoning
the aircraft with about as much emotion as I use when I'm ordering a burger
and fries.


....and he keeps giving good instruction in the process (i.e., "Fly
the airplane")


--Sylvain
  #13  
Old August 9th 05, 04:26 PM
Frankie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ya know...

.....this video made wonder: Is it common practice to eject from planes which
have ejection seats instead of ditching?

I was surprised they chose to eject and lose the plane instead of make an
off-airport landing in a clearing. Ejecting has risks of its own. It's a
violent event which can result in injury (which evidently happened).

Perhaps jets like that are considered too dangerous to ditch due to their
high landing speeds. Then again, a Hawk lands about the same speed as a
Citation.

Humm...


  #14  
Old August 9th 05, 10:58 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ShawnD2112 wrote:

A couple of seriously cool customers. The instructor talks about abandoning
the aircraft with about as much emotion as I use when I'm ordering a burger
and fries. I only hope I'm that calm and collected when I meet my first
in-flight emergency. My hat's off to these guys.


I was thinking the same thing. I guess that is one advantage of now
owning the airplane you are flying! :-)

Matt
  #15  
Old August 9th 05, 11:00 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frankie wrote:

Ya know...

....this video made wonder: Is it common practice to eject from planes which
have ejection seats instead of ditching?

I was surprised they chose to eject and lose the plane instead of make an
off-airport landing in a clearing. Ejecting has risks of its own. It's a
violent event which can result in injury (which evidently happened).

Perhaps jets like that are considered too dangerous to ditch due to their
high landing speeds. Then again, a Hawk lands about the same speed as a
Citation.


Yes, you don't want to land a jet full of fuel at 130 knots or more on
rough terrain. That is what the seats are for.

Matt
  #16  
Old August 10th 05, 03:38 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


http://www.fazed.org/video/
scroll down to the video in question (F-15 bird into engine)

There are aural cockpit warnings: "T6 NL" and "We are not done"

What do they mean?

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #17  
Old August 10th 05, 09:15 AM
Sylvain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:

There are aural cockpit warnings: "T6 NL" and "We are not done"

What do they mean?


I thought the second one actually was 'gear not down', wasn't it?

--Sylvain
  #18  
Old August 10th 05, 09:58 AM
Craig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:

http://www.fazed.org/video/
scroll down to the video in question (F-15 bird into engine)

There are aural cockpit warnings: "T6 NL" and "We are not done"

What do they mean?

Jose


There's a thread about this video on the Pprune military forum at :

http://www.pprune.com/forums/showthr...hreadid=184747

The 'more info' link in the second post talks about the T6NL. I agree
that the other warning sounds like "gear not down".
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mooney Engine Problems in Flight Paul Smedshammer Piloting 45 December 18th 04 09:40 AM
My Engine Fire!! [email protected] Piloting 21 April 2nd 04 05:02 PM
Real stats on engine failures? Captain Wubba Piloting 127 December 8th 03 04:09 PM
Corky's engine choice Corky Scott Home Built 39 August 8th 03 04:29 AM
fatal bird strike StellaStar Piloting 9 July 13th 03 09:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.