A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More Katrina



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st 05, 08:16 AM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2005-08-31, W P Dixon wrote:
Well he is in the political Catch 22. If the Pres does go people will bitch,
and if he doesn't people will bitch and say he doesn't care.


If the President is indeed strong, he will Do The Right Thing - not the
political thing. The Right Thing at this moment in time, I wager, is to
not get in the way. If necessary, he can explain why he is keeping away
- then the people criticising him will look rather pathetic that they
essentially want rescue work to be intefered with.

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #2  
Old August 31st 05, 11:58 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dylan Smith wrote:

On 2005-08-31, W P Dixon wrote:

Well he is in the political Catch 22. If the Pres does go people will bitch,
and if he doesn't people will bitch and say he doesn't care.



If the President is indeed strong, he will Do The Right Thing - not the
political thing. The Right Thing at this moment in time, I wager, is to
not get in the way. If necessary, he can explain why he is keeping away
- then the people criticising him will look rather pathetic that they
essentially want rescue work to be intefered with.


The right thing, IMO, would be to visit quietly and not have a TFR.
Does anyone really believe that a credible terrorist threat could be
mounted in such a disaster zone? Let's use some basic sense here.


Matt
  #3  
Old September 1st 05, 01:02 AM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The right thing, IMO, would be to visit quietly and not have a TFR. Does
anyone really believe that a credible terrorist threat could be mounted
in such a disaster zone? Let's use some basic sense here.


The current TFR has nothing to do with the Pres.
TFR's have historically been used in times of emergency to keep the
Lookie Loo's out of the area.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Katrina W P Dixon Piloting 20 September 1st 05 05:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.