![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've not studied the mogas market specifically, but most markets are
based on speculation, not current conditions. That basically means that any benefit associated with the effects of Katrina are already built into the price of gas. Its just like the stock market. When a company announces a great new money making opportunity, you don't have to wait for it to pay off in order to see the stock price go up, the stock prices goes up right away on the expection (as long as investors see it as realistic). This is call the "perfect market theory". As long as everyone has the same knowledge base of information (something the SEC tries to assure) markets will automatically price based on that fugure information, not the current situation. So, in short, I"m saying that any benefit of the end of Katrina to gas prices has probably already been reflected in the market. It would be interesting to see what fuel futures are selling for right now. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... I've not studied the mogas market specifically, but most markets are based on speculation, not current conditions. That basically means that any benefit associated with the effects of Katrina are already built into the price of gas. Speculation is based on trends forecasting, not disasters. Its just like the stock market. When a company announces a great new money making opportunity, you don't have to wait for it to pay off in order to see the stock price go up, the stock prices goes up right away on the expection (as long as investors see it as realistic). This is call the "perfect market theory". As long as everyone has the same knowledge base of information (something the SEC tries to assure) markets will automatically price based on that fugure information, not the current situation. "Perfect Market Theory" has been debunked so many times over so many years I'm surprised anyone still holds with it. Hell, von Mises debunked it back in the 1920's. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Speculation is based on trends forecasting, not disasters.
Actually, that is totally wrong. Speculation right now is 1) How damaged are the oil rigs in the gulf, no one really knows yet 2) What is left of the infrustruction, no one really knows yet etc, etc, etc If you actually study markets you will find that specualation is ALWAYS there. Investors buy based on future values and speculate on anythig that can effect price. "Perfect Market Theory" has been debunked so many times over so many years I'm surprised anyone still holds with it. Hell, von Mises debunked it back in the 1920's. Certainly misunderstood huh? Cleary, you've misundestood it. I guess its been debunked just like evolution, right? ![]() go all the time, it doesn't make existing ones wrong. A more detailed undestanding of the scientific method would make that more clear. -Robert, MBA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Speculation is based on trends forecasting, not disasters. Actually, that is totally wrong. Speculation right now is 1) How damaged are the oil rigs in the gulf, no one really knows yet It's hardly speculation AFTER THE FACT, other than how the market will react; in that case, it's a FORECAST since it's based on historical data. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's hardly speculation AFTER THE FACT, other than how the market will react; in that case, it's a FORECAST since it's based on historical data. I disagree, the fuels markets are always full of speculation. There is still A LOT we don't know about the fall out of Katrina. Once that is all know, speculation will be based on something else. Just look at the fluctuations in the futures markets. Think of it this way. If your neighbor knew exactly what the cost of supplying fuel was today and you actually had knowledge of future events to come who would make the most money in the market? You would buy fuels when you knew prices were going up and wait when you knew prices were going down. Your neighbor would just be reacting to current events and always one step behind the market. The airlines have entire departments of people who's jobs are to evaluate the fuel markets and try to gain knowledge of the markets that others don't. At certain points they buy contracts. That's why Southwest is doing so well right now. They are paying the lowest price in the industry for jet-A because they bought a contract awhile back that holds their prices until the end of the year. I was at the airport the other day talking to a Citation driver who just paid under $3/gal for his fuel. His company bought a contract before prices went up. Who knows if they got lucky or were smart. -Robert, MBA w/ a concentration in financial markets. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW: Just to be clear for those not familiar with financial portfolio
development. Southwest is actually hedging their fuel contracts by buying contracts in more liquid (i.e. tradable) commodities such as crude, etc. So, while they may be paying market rate at any particular airport, they are extracting income from the increased fuel prices through their commodities contracts. So their effective rate for fuel is less, although the credit card receipt may not reflect it. I just wanted to clarify that. -Robert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote: BTW: Just to be clear for those not familiar with financial portfolio development. Southwest is actually hedging their fuel contracts by buying contracts in more liquid (i.e. tradable) commodities such as crude, etc. So, while they may be paying market rate at any particular airport, they are extracting income from the increased fuel prices through their commodities contracts. So their effective rate for fuel is less, although the credit card receipt may not reflect it. I just wanted to clarify that. Jeez; the older I get, the more I realize how hard it is to get ALL the facts about anything. Thanks for the inside dope, Robert. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... BTW: Just to be clear for those not familiar with financial portfolio development. Southwest is actually hedging their fuel contracts by buying contracts in more liquid (i.e. tradable) commodities such as crude, etc. So, while they may be paying market rate at any particular airport, they are extracting income from the increased fuel prices through their commodities contracts. So their effective rate for fuel is less, although the credit card receipt may not reflect it. I just wanted to clarify that. And they positioning themselves for fuel savings/availability, or just playing the markets with extra cash they have laying around? -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... It's hardly speculation AFTER THE FACT, other than how the market will react; in that case, it's a FORECAST since it's based on historical data. I disagree, the fuels markets are always full of speculation. Non-sequitur. There is still A LOT we don't know about the fall out of Katrina. Of course; we don't know the future, but that doesn't mena we can't abstract from similar occurances in the past. That's still not speculation. Once that is all know, speculation will be based on something else. Just look at the fluctuations in the futures markets. Geez...they don't do market analysis, ala fellows like Martin Zweig? Think of it this way. If your neighbor knew exactly what the cost of supplying fuel was today and you actually had knowledge of future events to come who would make the most money in the market? Oh, don't go down that loony "perfect market information" rathole. You would buy fuels when you knew prices were going up and wait when you knew prices were going down. Your neighbor would just be reacting to current events and always one step behind the market. The airlines have entire departments of people who's jobs are to evaluate the fuel markets and try to gain knowledge of the markets that others don't. At certain points they buy contracts. That's why Southwest is doing so well right now. They are paying the lowest price in the industry for jet-A because they bought a contract awhile back that holds their prices until the end of the year. I was at the airport the other day talking to a Citation driver who just paid under $3/gal for his fuel. His company bought a contract before prices went up. Who knows if they got lucky or were smart. -Robert, MBA w/ a concentration in financial markets. And you still haven't made a joint assessment from analysis - speculation (wild assed guess). -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mathew,
If you honestly believe that the trading price of oil futures is not based on speculation of future events, may I suggest you look to your local high school for a begining class in economics. -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 07:04 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Is Your Airplane Susceptible To Mis Fu eling? A Simple Test For Fuel Contamination. | Nathan Young | Piloting | 4 | June 14th 04 06:13 PM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Owning | 77 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Piloting | 81 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |