A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OT (?): Manned Space Flight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 17th 05, 09:51 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

2018? In 1961 John Kennedy promised the Moon "before this decade
is out." From a standing start, America was on the moon in seven
years. Now, after 44 years of "space progress," it's gonna take
twice as long?


Although on the surface that seems strange, it's not. America now
fritters away over half of its annual expenditures on "entitlements."
There is simply no way we could afford to put the emphasis on an
Apollo-type effort anymore.

So, we'll have to do it "on the cheap" this time -- which is okay.

What are we looking for? NASA says they'll find
water, hydrogen and "valuable commodities." On the Moon? Go on!
Maybe someone takes that seriously, but he's not writing this
column. We've got robots on Mars right now. Put a few of them
on the moon. They don't break for lunch, or complain about the
cold nights, and they live on sunshine. Space exploration with
humans is about over.


That's crazy. Humanity's future is *not* on this planet. While it may
be premature for us to be taking the first steps off this planet -- I
think history will prove that Apollo was "a bridge too far" -- our
departure from Earth is as inevitable as was our migration to the "New
World" over 500 years ago.

The moon, then Mars, then the stars. Von Braun, Clarke and Asimov were
right -- they were just ahead of his time.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #2  
Old September 18th 05, 02:00 AM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com...
....

Although on the surface that seems strange, it's not. America now
fritters away over half of its annual expenditures on "entitlements."
There is simply no way we could afford to put the emphasis on an
Apollo-type effort anymore.

....

--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


Jay, this is the #1 problem with the US economy. We all know the major airlines are in trouble - why? mostly because of
the entitlements. Now if you extrapolate that out to gov't entitlements, the next 50 years are not going to be pretty...


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Thunderstorm - Ron Knott Greasy Rider© @invalid.com Naval Aviation 0 June 2nd 05 11:05 PM
Dumb Reg question John Gaquin Piloting 67 May 4th 05 04:54 AM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.