![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
so, as usual before retiring to bed, I am going through
the scriptures, i.e., 14 CFR, and tonight I was perusing chapter 61 -- which I am sure is on everyone's bed stand -- and came across a part that I haven't fully memorized yet :-) This is part 61.31(j)(2). Part 61.31 covers those endorsements one has to have on one's logbook in order to fly tailwheels, high-performance, complex, etc. aircraft, and subpart (j) concerns those endorsements required of glider pilots in order to perform aerotow, ground-tow or self-launch procedures. Now, like similar clauses, this one has a 'grand father' exception, which is 61.31(j)(2), but with a twist: unlike similar 'grand father' clauses which usually refer to time logged prior to a given date, this says that the aforementioned endorsements are not required of pilots who have had a glider *rating* obtained prior to August 4th, 1997. How does one documents / proves that one has had a rating prior to a given date? by looking at the date on your certificate or on the FAA online database? well, no, that won't work because these dates happen to be those of your latest rating or latest change of address... For some reasons I keep old papers and found a certificate dated 1996 with my private glider rating on it, which I photocopied right away and stuck in my logbook (would it be sufficient?) so I should be in the clear on this one. But think about this, even if you are not a glider pilot: a similar clause might eventually pop up in the future. Do you keep all your old certificates? those that we replace when we get new rating or a new address? Another odd thing about this 61.31(j)(2) clause is that it says 'rating' without specifying 'issued under this part' as is the case elsewhere (e.g., 61.123), so I reckon that any old odd pilot certificate or license from any ICAO country might have done just as well (but then I am just speculating here, if anyone knows better I'd be grateful for the input). In summary, how does one documents that one has received a given rating at or prior to a given date? --Sylvain |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, all of mine have been entered in my logbook, in the back.
A year or two ago I set out to scan each page of my logbook, since I have to carry it with me when I fly (recreational certificate) so I would always have a backup. But I haven't been very faithful about keeping it up. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could you use the log entry from the examiner? All my ratings (all 6 of
them) have includes a log book notation by the examiner such as "ASES PASSED". etc. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The DE always entered mine into my logbook after the checkride,
including glider, which is what you seem to be concerned about. If it were ever an issue, I would assume Oklahoma has the proof. Sylvain wrote: In summary, how does one documents that one has received a given rating at or prior to a given date? --Sylvain |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:40:32 -0600, RomeoMike
wrote: The DE always entered mine into my logbook after the checkride, including glider, which is what you seem to be concerned about. If it were ever an issue, I would assume Oklahoma has the proof. Perhaps he was concerned about ratings that don't require an entry, such as an experienced taildragger pilot's not requiring a taildragger endorsement because he'd obtained the experience before the requirement came in? Seems to me that there's a similar situation with the new Sport Pilot certificate. New sport pilots have to have training recorded, but I can fly as a sport pilot without any endorsement or paperwork. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cub Driver" wrote in message
... Perhaps he was concerned about ratings that don't require an entry, such as an experienced taildragger pilot's not requiring a taildragger endorsement because he'd obtained the experience before the requirement came in? That wasn't what he was asking. But even so, in that case the pilot should have a logbook record of the tailwheel time. Pilots are required to log any and all time that they want to use in order to meet the various requirements found in Part 61. Seems to me that there's a similar situation with the new Sport Pilot certificate. New sport pilots have to have training recorded, but I can fly as a sport pilot without any endorsement or paperwork. Just as the holder of a Commercial Pilot certificate need not carry proof of a Private Pilot training when exercising only the privileges of a Private Pilot, the holder of a Private Pilot (or Recreational, in your case) need not carry proof of Sport Pilot training when exercising only the privileges of a Sport Pilot. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help required: Document change control of JAR's | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | September 12th 05 02:48 PM |
VA Assistance for Glider Ratings | Brian | Soaring | 0 | July 18th 05 04:01 PM |
ratings | mommers | Piloting | 3 | July 8th 04 11:06 AM |
TV Stations Targeting GA Security to Boost Ratings | Dan Hoehn | General Aviation | 0 | May 14th 04 08:09 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |