![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 75% "Best Power" and 75% "Best Economy" couldn't both be actually
75%, could they? Yes, they could. You are using more gas at the 75% best power setting than at the 75% best economy setting. Sorry, I mean they couldn't both actually be 75% for the same MAP/RPM combo. The leaner setting would have to be developing less power, wouldn't it? The thottle and mixture levers may be in a different position in order to achieve the same MAP/RPM, as a result of using the fuel more or less efficiently. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a O-360 and if you look at the Lycoming manual you can have
different settings for the same power and save fuel one compaired to the other. Usually it is the MP over the RPM that gives you the better fuel burn. ------------- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI Jose wrote: The 75% "Best Power" and 75% "Best Economy" couldn't both be actually 75%, could they? Yes, they could. You are using more gas at the 75% best power setting than at the 75% best economy setting. Sorry, I mean they couldn't both actually be 75% for the same MAP/RPM combo. The leaner setting would have to be developing less power, wouldn't it? The thottle and mixture levers may be in a different position in order to achieve the same MAP/RPM, as a result of using the fuel more or less efficiently. Jose |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|