A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 22nd 05, 02:10 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure


"Mike W." wrote in message
...

If you hear 'runway zero', then you know you have missed something in the
transmission.


Two things, actually, the runway and the airport.


  #2  
Old October 22nd 05, 03:09 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure

If you hear 'runway zero', then you know you have missed something in the
transmission.

Two things, actually, the runway and the airport.


Yes, but missing the airport does not imply a transmission error. The
airport simply may not have been transmitted. Poor form, but not a data
error.

Jose
--
Money: what you need when you run out of brains.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #3  
Old October 22nd 05, 05:15 PM
Joe Johnson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure

Hi Jose. I like your checksum argument. It's two digits for me from now
on, and we should urge everyone to adopt this convention.


  #4  
Old October 22nd 05, 05:21 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure

Hi Jose. I like your checksum argument. It's two digits for me from now
on, and we should urge everyone to adopt this convention.


It's actually somebody else's idea, though I recognized it as like a
checksum. However, "zero two" and "two zero" can be confused with each
other even when each is clearly heard.

You've all heard of the dyslexic agnostic insomniac? He stayed up all
night wondering if there really was a dog.

Jose
--
Money: what you need when you run out of brains.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #5  
Old October 22nd 05, 05:44 PM
Tauno Voipio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure

Jose wrote:
Hi Jose. I like your checksum argument. It's two digits for me from now
on, and we should urge everyone to adopt this convention.



It's actually somebody else's idea, though I recognized it as like a
checksum. However, "zero two" and "two zero" can be confused with each
other even when each is clearly heard.


There is another pair: 13-31.

At least here, the combinations 02-20 and 13-31 are avoided
by naming the runway to the next available direction, so it
may be up to 10 degrees off course. An example is Mariehamn,
Aland Islands: the runway is 021/201 degrees, but the naming
is 03-21.

--

Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio (at) iki fi
  #6  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:25 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure


"Joe Johnson" wrote in message
...

Hi Jose. I like your checksum argument. It's two digits for me from now
on, and we should urge everyone to adopt this convention.


Except those operating at Kodiak, of course.


  #7  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:11 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure


"Jose" wrote in message
...

Yes, but missing the airport does not imply a transmission error. The
airport simply may not have been transmitted. Poor form, but not a data
error.


Not a data error? If the pilot doesn't identify the airport I may have to
ask him where he's going. If he does identify it and it's not the airport
I'm going to I can ignore him. The location is important data.


  #8  
Old October 23rd 05, 03:24 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Runway Numbering - Radio Procedure

Not a data error? If the pilot doesn't identify the airport I may have to
ask him where he's going. If he does identify it and it's not the airport
I'm going to I can ignore him. The location is important data.


Correct. Not a data error (more precisely, not an indication that what
was understood is different from what was transmitted). It may well be
an error on the part of the person transmitting to omit the data, but
that's not the kind of error that pertains to "zero two".

Jose
--
Money: what you need when you run out of brains.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Cleared Straight-In Runway X; Report Y Miles Final" Jim Cummiskey Piloting 86 August 16th 04 06:23 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Procedure Turn Bravo8500 Instrument Flight Rules 65 April 22nd 04 03:27 AM
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters John Cook Military Aviation 193 April 11th 04 03:33 AM
Ham Radio In The Airplane Cy Galley Owning 23 July 8th 03 03:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.