![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably because it's unnecessary. If you want direct just file direct.
Out West direct for the entire flight is not usually possible with non-turbo aircraft. What usually happens is when you get half way in the middle of no-where on an airway, the controller will send you direct to some intersection because he knows you are now far enough way to avoid the mountain rather than have to continue to fly down the airway until you get to the next intersection. Besides, I can't remember the last time I was actually given the route I filed. I've tried to second guess the routes in the Bay Area and L.A (even the central valley) but they seem to change on a daily basis (probably depending on which way each airport is landing jets). When flying into SoCal you usually get an "updated" routing about 1/2 way down. That routing is usually longer than the amount of space you have on your flight plan (bring extra paper to write it all down). -Robret |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ps.com... Out West direct for the entire flight is not usually possible with non-turbo aircraft. So what would be the purpose of putting "VFR GPS" in the remarks section for such flights? What usually happens is when you get half way in the middle of no-where on an airway, the controller will send you direct to some intersection because he knows you are now far enough way to avoid the mountain rather than have to continue to fly down the airway until you get to the next intersection. So why don't you file that? Besides, I can't remember the last time I was actually given the route I filed. I've tried to second guess the routes in the Bay Area and L.A (even the central valley) but they seem to change on a daily basis (probably depending on which way each airport is landing jets). When flying into SoCal you usually get an "updated" routing about 1/2 way down. That routing is usually longer than the amount of space you have on your flight plan (bring extra paper to write it all down). So what effect would putting "VFR GPS" in the remarks section have on that? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what would be the purpose of putting "VFR GPS" in the remarks section for
such flights? I usually start out filing mostly direct (other than through the passes and mountains). ATC always says no and gives a bunch of airways depending on where all the jet arrivals are. Having "VFR GPS" seems to help in that the controllers will often offer me ad-hoc "short cuts" in the airway routing when there are holes in the arrivals. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... So what would be the purpose of putting "VFR GPS" in the remarks section for such flights? I usually start out filing mostly direct (other than through the passes and mountains). ATC always says no and gives a bunch of airways depending on where all the jet arrivals are. Having "VFR GPS" seems to help in that the controllers will often offer me ad-hoc "short cuts" in the airway routing when there are holes in the arrivals. Filing mostly direct (other than through the passes and mountains) should be enough to tell the controller you can navigate direct. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|